If we were writing a persuasive piece, the "least to most" arrangement can be used. This is used as a structural design of your essay that ties in well with the thesis. Even though I don't typically like it, it is commonly taught and often expressed as the best structure to use.
The "least to most" arrangement manages to catch the reader's attention with the least "important" evidence before going into depth and detail about your ideas and argument. Analogically speaking, it can be referred to as a hill. The bottom segment accounts for the least important details of your argument, and each step you take, you dive deeper in your analysis/idea, until you reach the top, where you should have already persuaded the marker/reader.
You didn't give the options. However, i'll try.
To me, a stone cannot be ethical because it cannot suffer. Indeed, the capacity for suffering must be satisfied before we talk about interest in a meaningful way. For instance, nothing we could possibly do for a stone could make a difference in its welfare. It don't have interest. Whereas, we, humans have interest. Therefore we can be ethical because we are sentient beings that can be benifited or harmed. It's because we can experience pain as a result.
Hope this helps !
Photon
Answer:
C
Explanation:
referred to a medical condition in which there is a rupture or strain of a muscle or tendons to which the muscle is attached in the body caused due to an injury or due to overworking of the muscles and acute muscle fatigue.
Answer:
Jonas does not understand the comparison, because he has never seen snow or a sled. The Receiver decides to transmit the memory of snow to him. He instructs Jonas to take off his tunic and lie face-down on the bed.
Explanation:can i have brainliest plzz