The US Constitution, Section 2 of Article III, explained the right to have an impeachment case decided by an impartial court.
What is constitution?
The “constitution” of a country, state, or organization is a statement of the fundamental principles and laws that specify the roles and obligations of the government and offer some safeguards for its people.
The types of cases that the Supreme Court and other federal courts will handle are described in this section. The capacity of a court to hear a case is known as jurisdiction. Any legal issues arising from international agreements, domestic laws, or the US Constitution.
As a result, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about the constitution, here:
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ1
Answer:
TW//
I went to a plantation during spring break and I learned in depth how slaves were treated. But one that really stuck out to me is how the women were treated as s3x objects. They were rap3d and they were also forced to have children to increase the slave populations.
Explanation:
Answer:
c. President Franklin D. Roosevelt
Explanation:
The answer is C
What about it?
I don’t even know what is your question
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
- On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
- On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Happy 2019! :)
