Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated by James Earl Ray on April 4th, 1968 with a rifle. And James was found guilty and sentenced to 99 years in jail, but died in jail.
Answer: Henrik tells Annemarie that is far easier to be brave when one does not know everything. What he means is that the lack of knowledge about dangerous secrets or impeding threats can help someone keep his/her composure during stressful situations.
In my opinion, the disruption of trade is most likely the MOST severe effect that resulted in the fall of Rome. Trade has always been vital because every country has something special to offer weather it be oil, wool, wine, and a wide variety of food. Being able to trade with countries like Spain, France, North Africa, and the Middle East provided them a wide range of objects such as wool, tin, and lead. If their trade was disrupted, they empire would crumble at a fast rate due to a lack of supplies that were once vital. There would be less money coming through, and chaos would reign.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
hope the answers helped you. pls mark as brainliest
Explanation:
In 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville took a 10-month trip to the United States to study the American penal system. In the resulting book—Democracy in America—he singled out one noteworthy feature: “Amongst the novel objects that attracted my attention during my stay in the United States, nothing struck me more forcibly than the general equality of conditions.” Although he ignored the fact of slavery, his reference to economic equality among white Americans was, at the time, accurate. According to economic historians Peter H. Lindert and Jeffrey G. Williamson, the share of national income going to the top one percent was less than 10 percent.Today, the share of national income going to the top one percent has doubled, while median wages have remained largely stagnant. In the last 40 years, CEO wages have grown nearly 100 times the rate of wages for average workers. The popularity of left-wing candidates like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders—both with significant redistributive policies at the core of their platform—reflects the moral concerns many have about high levels of income inequality.
But no moral case for economic equality will convince those on the Right. What is at stake is an idea of fairness. It is unfair, so the thought goes, for others to live off one’s labor without making an equally productive contribution to society. This appeal to fairness trumps any moral case for income redistribution. There is, however, another case for relative equality of conditions that appeals to the same idea of fairness that’s appealed to by the opponents of redistribution. This view, which has largely been neglected since Tocqueville’s meditations on the subject, argues that a certain degree of economic equality is necessary for fair participation in political life.
