True. because out of 70 delegates only 39 signed the Constitution.
<span />
"<span>The Union desired to push the Native Americans off of their land to further the expansion West" would be the best option from the list, since both sides knew that their future relationship would not last in any meaningful way. </span>
Hammurabi's Code set laws in the Babylonian empire that applied to everyone. Including Hammurabi himself. This was important because it had never been done before, at least not at such a bit level. Hammurabi's Code inspired many countries to do the same, which led to monarchs being less powerful and was another step in the direction of democracy.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong :)
It was different because it remained independent during the colonial era when the rest of South East Asia was colonized. It modernized itself and worked with both British and French colonies but remained independent and chose who they wanted to work with. The territory of Siam is what is nowadays known as Thailand, so you can see that Thailand managed to develop itself and its culture independently of the colonizers who ran rampant among the South East Asian region and which caused many wars in recent times.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be "</span><span>by breaking up different unionized labor strikes and vetoing the Taft-Hartley Act," since he felt that these were having a negative impact on competition in the US economy. </span>
