Answer:
B) dialect
Explanation:
I hope this helped! Have a lovely day!
Answer: I believe Mikhail chose to take a satirical approach to writing about war not to be ignorant but to set a different perspective on times that we know of today as full of gore and violence.
Explanation:
This is not Plato so feel free to copy and paste my answer it is not copyright :) please mark brainliest
Answer:
Geographic analyses of illness patterns have supported major public health initiatives, and can be attributed in large part to the control of communicable conditions in developed countries.
The availability of geographic information systems and public population-based data has developed new opportunities for scientists to identify causes and craft interventions for chronic illnesses.
“Few studies have assessed geographic patterns that link household incomes to major preventable complications of chronic diseases
Explanation:
The details from the story that support Santiago's ostracization are:
- "Many fishermen were around the skiff looking at what was lashed beside it and one was in the water…measuring the skeleton with a length of line."
- "They sat on the Terrace and many of the fishermen made fun of the old man and he was not angry."
<h3>What are the supporting details in a story?</h3>
The supporting details in a story are those facts that give credence to a particular inference or conclusion. The inference is that Santiago was ostracized because of his inability to catch a fish.
In the two selected answers above, we can see that Santiago was laughed at by his fellow fishermen who mocked his inability to catch fish. So options B and C are supporting details of the inference.
Learn more about supporting details here:
brainly.com/question/540693
#SPJ1
Answer:
- Ben has not committed an assault or a battery because he acted in self defense.
Explanation:
As per the question, the statement that illustrates a true claim regarding the given situation is that Ben has neither committed an assault or battery as whatever he did(shoving Mike) was just an action in self-defense to protect himself from Mike's blow. It was Mike who attempts to strike Ben at first while the latter was just attempting to safeguard himself from his blow. Therefore, Ben's actions could not be considered either an offense/assault or battery as he acted in Self-defense and not intentionally.
