The best angle relationship that describes angles BAC and EAF is supplementary angles
The sum of angle on a straight line is supplementary i.e. they sum up to 180 degrees.
If Angles BAE and FAC are straight angles, it means they are linear pairs and their sum is 180 degrees. Mathematically;
m<BAE + m<FAC = 180degrees
Hence we can conclude that the best angle relationship that describes angles BAC and EAF is supplementary angles
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/22309882
a.) A flat pattern that could be folded to make a 3-dimensional figure is called a "net." You can draw one for Tyler's bench by picking any surface of that rectangular prism and making a drawing of it. At any edge you choose, you can add the adjacent surface to your drawing. Keep doing this until all 6 surfaces are shown in their correct relationship to adjacent surfaces. An example is attached. (This is not the only way the net can be drawn.)
Interior lines of the net can be solid or dashed as you wish. I have shown some of them dashed so as to better illustrate how the area can be computed.
b.) The area of this figure represents the surface area of the rectangular prism. The dimensions of each surface will be 1×1.5, 1×5, or 1.5×5. There are two surfaces with each pair of dimensions. (Perhaps you can find each of these rectangles on the net diagram. Ones with the same dimensions are opposite faces of the rectangular prism.) We can add up the areas of the smaller rectangles to find the total, or we can take advantage of the drawing and divide the area into a smaller number of larger chunks that may make the computation easier.
For example, the rectangle AI that is shaded red is 5×4 in size, for a total of 20 ft². The rectangle KN that is shaded green is 8×1 in size, for a total of 8 ft². Then the total amount of cloth Tyler needs to reupholster his bench is
... 20 ft² + 8 ft² = 28 ft²
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
How did it go from "rope" to "ribbon", therefore, the statement is incorrect. This is a man-made equation that clearly has a mistake. If it was to say, "Will Scott have enough rope?" then the answer will be "YES"
All you have to do is plug in the 2 for x which gives you 8 as the answer
Answer:
<h2>124.1m</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
29.4 per sec > Building 80m
Height = S = 4.9t^2 + 29.4t + 80
Solve for t:
t = 1.24 (approximately)
If t needed coordinates / solve using the quadratic formula:
t = (1.24 , -7.24)
<h3>The ball's maximum height is 124.1 meters.</h3>