1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Varvara68 [4.7K]
3 years ago
14

Why would a scientist use scanning electron microscope instead of just a light microscope to

History
1 answer:
Mariana [72]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

because a light microscope would only allow the scientist to see the outer layer of the fossil, but the electron would be more benificial to see it more in depth

Explanation:

i hope that helped please mark me brainliest :)

You might be interested in
Why did the zhou establish their own dynasty?
ExtremeBDS [4]
The Shang Dynasty had nearly come to an end
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Concerned with a case in which a group of students wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war, Tinker v. Des Mo
larisa [96]

Answer:

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

The court found that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

The court’s majority opinion, written by Justice Abe Fortas, went on to affirm the freedom that young people have under the Constitution:

In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students… are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved. In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views

Explanation:

Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools.

Mary Beth Tinker was a 13-year-old junior high school student in December 1965 when she and a group of students decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. The school board got wind of the protest and passed a preemptive ban. When Mary Beth arrived at school on Dec. 16, she was asked to remove the armband and was then suspended.

Four other students were suspended as well, including her brother John Tinker and Chris Eckhardt. The students were told they could not return to school until they agreed to remove their armbands. The students returned after the Christmas break without armbands, but in protest, they wore black clothing for the remainder of the school year — and filed a First Amendment lawsuit.

Represented by the ACLU, the students and their families embarked on a four-year court battle that culminated in the landmark Supreme Court decision. Dan Johnston, a young lawyer also from Des Moines and just out of law school, argued the case.

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement best explains why the Clovis people disappeared?
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

I got you.

Explanation:

1- The correct answer is A. Clovis people disappeared because they overhunted the big animals that were their food source.

8 0
3 years ago
Why would some members of the Continental Congress be opposed to signing the Declaration?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

One of the most famous reasons for why certain delegates didn't sign was that the document lacked a legitimate Bill of Rights which would protect the rights of States and the freedom of individuals. Three main advocates of this movement were George Mason, Elbridge Gerry, and Edmund Randolph. Hope this helps!

4 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of the Puritans settling the New England colonies? a. to stabilize the immigrants traveling to the United S
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

c. To practice their religion freely.

Explanation:

The Puritans were immigrants from England who were opposed to the Catholic Church of England and its laws and regulations. Because of their dissent against the Catholic ruling, these Protestants came to America to be free from the constraints under the Church of England.

These Puritans were mostly Protestants who were unable to practice their religion freely. With their new settlement at the New England colonies, they were able to freely enjoy the Protestant religion.

Thus, the correct answer is option c.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the economies of the North and South during the early 1800s
    10·2 answers
  • In the United States, your legal right to express your political opinions to government officials is granted under the _______ A
    11·1 answer
  • The Southern Colonies were established mostly for social reasons. cultural reasons. religious reasons. economic reasons.
    12·2 answers
  • PLZ WRITE IN COMPLETE SENTENCE
    5·1 answer
  • What was the name of the epidemic that swept throughout the Byzantine Empire, killing over 5,000
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the five pillars of Islam.
    5·2 answers
  • HELPPP I CANT GET IT WRONG PLS PLS PLS
    6·2 answers
  • The Protestant Reformation led to which outcome?
    6·1 answer
  • Category A
    10·1 answer
  • Who was removed from power in
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!