Answer:
Basically, dealing with the "software crisis" is what we now call software engineering. We just see the field more clearly now.
What this crisis was all about is that in the early days of the modern technological era -- in the 1950s, say -- there was tremendous optimism about the effect that digital computers could have on society, on their ability to literally solve humanity's problems. We just needed to formalize important questions and let our hulking "digital brains" come up with the answers.
Artificial intelligence, for example, had some early successes in easy to formalize domains like chess and these sorts of successes led to lots of people who should have known better making extremely naive predictions about how soon perfect machine translation would transform human interaction and how soon rote and onerous work would be relegated to the dustbin of history by autonomous intelligent machines.
No need to woory abt age !!! In today's competitive grant world, this phenomenon is exacerbated. It is dangerous to one's funding to go against the trend, and if there is a lab to support and mouths to feed, the disincentives are great. This phenomenon stifles creativity, perhaps far more than biological age does.
<span>While it is not frequently acknowledged either in the popular press or in scientific literature, a significant fraction of scientific discovery is the result of serendipity (or to put it more bluntly, luck). From the discovery of penicillin by Fleming to the discovery of new ionization techniques such as MALDI that power modern mass-spectrometry based proteomic research, luck has frequently played a big role. Such discoveries are generally attributed to hard work and genius, rather than to luck. Doing so gives the “genius” too much credit and luck too little.
</span><span>Risk taking is where most of the big discoveries in science lie. so takerisks.
</span>enjoy always specially when you r working and learn to say no
Learning to say “no” is particularly important for young faculty, who find themselves barraged with such requests, and who can easily get sucked into full-time committee duties. It is wise to step back frequently and ask, “overall, is this work I am doing fun?” If the answer is no, perhaps it is time to revisit and consider diving into a new area.
<span>Note the distinction in this guideline from: “learn to write and present well.”
</span><span>Understanding and conveying the big picture for one's work is perhaps the greatest challenge facing young scientists
</span>That's all I can give.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Predicate methods typically test a condition and do not modify the object on which they're called.
Answer:
Please look below for the answer
Explanation:
The primary limitation is that they don’t protect in real time. They also only perform quick scans which is not that efficient. They cannot scan the Windows directory. They only install on 64-bit operating systems
Hope I helped pls mark as brainliest
