Select all the correct answers.

History

1 answer:

saul85 [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The correct answers are A) It established a territorial government that was appointed by the president and E) It allowed for the settlement of the Unassigned Lands by US citizens.

Explanation:

The two statements that explain the purpose or impact of the Organic Act are: It established a territorial government that was appointed by the president and It allowed for the settlement of the Unassigned Lands by US citizens.

The Organic Act was passed in 1916 and it was created to the correct operation of parks and the laws to conserve these protected areas. This Organic Act defines the land areas and the resources for better management purposes and established the responsibilities of the National Park Service. The act was a great step from the US government to have a good park and recreation system in place for US citizens to enjoy and respect the protected areas.

You might be interested in

What did president carter fail to do

Pepsi [2]

President carter failed to sympathise for the people of his country. Some say that he was greedy and only did what he did to gain popularity. His decisions werent well thought out as well

5 0

4 years ago

Thomas Paine supported parliaments power to make laws for the colonies

Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

False?

Explanation:

thomas Paine's 'Common Sense'

7 0

2 years ago

What factors helped the North to produce more arms and supplies than the South?

I am Lyosha [343]

B is your correct answer. Hope this helps :)

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following situation factors would cause a business to locate in proximity to its input (raw materials)?

katovenus [111]

Answer:

Question 5 a) Bulk-reducing industry

Question 6 b) footloose firm

Question 7 b) Land

Question 8 c) Paper Products

Question 9 c) Lower wages, lower transportation costs, lower environmental restrictions, no tariffs

Question 10 b) deindustrialization

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

What is the potential downside of globalization

alina1380 [7]

Probably the most dangerous thing about globalization is that because most countries would operate a free market, then the bigger nations are able to kill off the smaller nations that are third world countries. Since the bigger nations have more manpower and more resources, they can provide better products. This in turn would mean big competition for the third world countries in a global market. This would be very harmful to those developing countries.

6 0

3 years ago