With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.
Answer: I cant see any of the reasons
Explanation:
Answer:
It allows the reader to imagine the teachers voice.
Correct answer choice is:
Electricity replaced steam power in homes and businesses.
Explanation:
The key distinction between first and second industrial revolution is that the primary age was targeted on Textiles, steam power, and iron whereas the second was targeted on steel, railroads, petroleum, chemicals and electricity. Second age, that began somewhere within the nineteenth century, is additionally referred to as the industrial revolution.
