Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.
<em>I hope it helped! If you need more help let me know and I'll try to help you the best I can. </em>
Answer: It provides an illustration of the challenges African Americans of the time had to face.
Explanation: Look to the sentences Before & After the phrase. This explains that there was still difficulty even in the North.
Human behaviour can affect the way society can be organized. Let’s say, if an individual is lazy, he/she won’t likely be contributing. Or, if an individual has anger management, he/she could be in a rage state where he won’t likely be contributing as much, to the point where he/she destroys objects or so.
The answer is b.<span>In his “I Have a Dream” speech, King uses both metaphor and repetition as rhetorical techniques to convince his audience to work toward a future of equality.
</span>
