I can’t tell where your third stanza is due to how you typed it. You didn’t make it visible enough to tell.
Answer:
Hale's stance on seeking an explanation for what is happening, reaches John because he is being tried without any concrete evidence, with nothing to explain the trial.
Explanation:
John Proctor was accused of witchcraft completely unfairly, yet he went to trial, with no evidence to back up the charges and even with the knowledge that Abigail accused him of revenge. This experience is reached by the words of Hale, who says, that it is necessary to look for an explanation for what is happening in the city, instead of causing the collapse that is happening.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Paper probably shouldn't be capitalized, based on context and what I'm seeing.
Sorry if this is wrong.
Answer:
i hope this is what you're looking for,
A good argument must have: true premises, be valid or strong, and have premises that are more plausible than its conclusion.
