1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yarga [219]
3 years ago
8

PLEASE HELP!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!! According to the ___ (Second Amendment, Third Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Seventh Amendm

ent) all US citizens were allowed to bear and keep arms. Americans disagree whether these rights were intended for individual self-defense or for ___ (Disputes between states, freedom to hunt, state militias)
History
2 answers:
gulaghasi [49]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

According to the Second Amendment, all US citzens were allowed to bear and keep arms.  It is not clear whether that provided the right to individual self-defense or to state militias.

Explanation:

The Second Amendment of the Constitution that was adopted in 1791 was meant to provide a check on congressional power and the federal government under Article I Section 8. This is the section of the Amendment that addresses the rights of the individual to organize, arm and discipline the federal militia. This amendment is controversial in modern society today because some people interpret it as the Constitutional defense for an individual to bear arms. It is an important part of the controversy over gun control in the United States.

There is some disagreement about the extent to which this right was applicable because the Second Amendment reads "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." There are therefore some who say that the right to bear arms is only in the context of militias needed to defend the rights of the state.  

Vladimir79 [104]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Second Amendment & State militias

Explanation:

I know this for a fact, I got it correct.

You might be interested in
Should there be a _leaving the president, vice president, speaker of the house and president pro tempore unable to assume the du
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

Catastrophe the Presidential order of succession

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Using the images above, identify the author’s point of view concerning nationalism?
Kamila [148]
It affected Germany in a bad way because he used nationalism as a way to distract his people from the fact that they’ve caused cruel acts against their own government.
4 0
3 years ago
Explain ONE historical development that contributed to the context for rise of extremist groups prior to World War II.
kirill115 [55]

Answer: PLZ GIVE BRAINLEST

Explanation:

Historians from many countries have given considerable attention to studying and understanding the causes of World War II, a global war from 1939 to 1945 that was the deadliest conflict in human history. The immediate precipitating event was the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany on September 1, 1939, and the subsequent declarations of war on Germany made by Britain and France, but many other prior events have been suggested as ultimate causes. Primary themes in historical analysis of the war's origins include the political takeover of Germany in 1933 by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party; Japanese militarism against China, which led to the Second Sino-Japanese War; Italian aggression against Ethiopia, which led to the Second Italo-Ethiopian War; and Germany's initial success in negotiating a neutrality pact with the Soviet Union to divide territorial control of Eastern Europe between them.

During the Battle of Westerplatte, the German battleship Schleswig-Holstein attacks Westerplatte at the start of the war, September 1, 1939

The destroyer USS Shaw explodes during the attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941

During the interwar period, deep anger arose in the Weimar Republic regarding the conditions of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, which punished Germany for its role in World War I with severe conditions and heavy financial reparations in order to prevent it from ever becoming a military power again. This provoked strong currents of revanchism in German politics, with complaints primarily focused on the demilitarization of the Rhineland, the prohibition of German unification with Austria, and the loss of some German-speaking territories and overseas colonies.

The 1930s were a decade in which democracy was in disrepute; countries across the world turned to authoritarian regimes during the worldwide economic crisis of the Great Depression.[1] In Germany, resentment and hatred of other countries was intensified by the end of World War I in late 1918, the world's social and geopolitical circumstances had fundamentally and irrevocably changed. The Allies had been victorious, but many of Europe's economies and infrastructures were devastated, including those of the victors. France, along with the other victor countries, was in a desperate situation regarding its economy, security, and morale, and understood that its position in 1918 was "artificial and transitory".[2] Thus, Prime Minister of France Georges Clemenceau worked to gain French security via the Treaty of Versailles, and French security demands, such as reparations, coal payments, and a demilitarized Rhineland, took precedence at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919–1920,[2] which designed the treaty. The war "must be someone's fault – and that's a very natural human reaction" analyzed historian Margaret MacMillan.[3] Germany was charged with the sole responsibility of starting World War I, and the "War Guilt Clause" was the first step towards a satisfying revenge for the victor countries, namely France, against Germany. Ginsberg argues, "France was greatly weakened and, in its weakness and fear of a resurgent Germany, sought to isolate and punish Germany....French revenge would come back to haunt France during the Nazi invasion and occupation twenty years later."[4]

7 0
3 years ago
Who was the 23rd President of the United States?​
nekit [7.7K]

Benjamin Harrison

hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Greeks defeat the Persian army?
vfiekz [6]
A.<span> They used an effective military formation known as a phalanx
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which civilization started in the Nile River Valley? A. China B. Harappa C. Sumer D. Egypt
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the slave trade referred to as breaking trade?
    10·1 answer
  • A ruler with total power in a country is called a(n)?
    9·1 answer
  • Which ancient civilization conquered the lands that bordered on the mediterranean sea?
    14·1 answer
  • Which action by the president is NOT a check on the power of the legislative branch?
    11·1 answer
  • Which country had the most powerful navy in the sixteenths century
    12·1 answer
  • What were some differences between the virginia colony and the plymouth colony?
    8·1 answer
  • ONLY ANSWER IF YOU KNOW!! PLEASE HELP!! I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLYEST!!
    12·2 answers
  • What does the first section of article 6 of the constitution say?
    11·1 answer
  • The year is 1928. You are a middle class man/woman living in New York City. Describe your life in terms of economic, political a
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!