1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lutik1710 [3]
3 years ago
5

Read the passage from a statement given by president franklin d Roosevelt. Today hope of many years standing is in large part fu

lfilled. The civilization of the past hundred years, with its startling industrial changes, has tended more and more to make life insecure. Young people have come here o wonder what would be their lot when they came to old age. The man with a job has wondered how ong the job would last. How did the law described in this passage benefit Americans?
- it provides auppprt for people who could no longer work
- it put Americans to work rebuilding the country’s infrastructure
- it offered temporary relief for people who became unemployed
-It gave workers the right to form unions and bargain collectively
History
1 answer:
SVETLANKA909090 [29]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

- it put Americans to work rebuilding the country’s infrastructure

Explanation:

This is referencing the new deal.

You might be interested in
How could using ration stamps help the Allies win the war?
VLD [36.1K]
Slogans such as “Food will win the war” compelled people to avoid wasting precious groceries and encouraged them to eat a multitude of fresh fruits and vegetables, which were too difficult to transport overseas.
5 0
2 years ago
Why did Emperor in Shihuangdi practice cerchio
algol13
I think the 3rd answer is correct
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Congress cannot establish naturalization laws. True or False
Mamont248 [21]
The answer for this question would be FALSE because congress can establish naturalization laws.
4 0
4 years ago
What is the main purpose of government?
Lunna [17]

Answer: C- to protect citizens' rights​

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The line-item veto challenges the notion of A) senatorial courtesy B) congressional oversight C) federalism D) executive privile
Alex777 [14]

Answer:  E) separation of powers

Explanation:

The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.

Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.

It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.

This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which or the European Powers ruled over the largest amount of Africa in 1913? A.Portugal and Spain B.Italy and Germany C.France
    9·2 answers
  • Who was president of the Republican from March 4, 1861, to April 15, 1865?
    11·2 answers
  • Economic imperialism
    12·1 answer
  • What was Illinois before it became a state
    14·1 answer
  • New York World-Telegram newspaper
    7·1 answer
  • Write at least 2 paragraphs to support this statement: “Through a series of steps, what began as a single person refusing to get
    8·1 answer
  • Question 1 of 5
    8·1 answer
  • [BRAINLIEST] List five of the most important events in the march to European control of Africa.
    10·1 answer
  • Explica de qué manera te ayuda conocer la cultura del país para comprender la etapa del “milagro mexicano”.
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the Lohore Resolution passed in 1940?​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!