Answer:
"Just Noticeable Difference".
Explanation:
According to my research on psycho-physics, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this rests on the measurement of the "Just Noticeable Difference". Which is defined as the minimum amount that something needs to be changed in order for the observer to detect any sort of difference.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
When people behave in ways that are at odds with their attitudes, they report feeling negative emotions. That seems to support the cognitive dissonance theory.
Cognitive dissonance theory is a theory in the field of psychology. According to it, when two ideas or actions are not psychologically consistent with each other (conflicting), people do everything to change them until both of them become consistent. It may occur when people seek to justify or at least explain their beliefs.
One example of cognitive dissonance is smoking. Smokers tend to use justification beliefs in order to reduce their cognitive dissonance about the negative consequences of smoking tobacco.
Learn more about cognitive dissonance at brainly.com/question/14230512
#SPJ4
Answer:
Cellular testing is a very expensive process.
Explanation:
Cellular testing is not a very expensive process given that the equipment used for it isn't hard to acquire and the process itself isn't expensive.
The rest of the options are true as well: The tests can be done on bacteria or animal cellsl; the Ames test is used and Cellular studies aren't 100 percent accurate in identifying carcinogens.
Answer: B) He became an opponent of the tax and attempted to explain to Parliament why the colonists were so resistant to it.
Explanation:
Before the American Revolution, Benjamin Franklin had been a spokesperson for some American colonies in Britain and used this opportunity to call for the better treatment of the American colonies by the British.
When he learnt that the Colonists were quite unhappy with the Stamp Act, he led a party to the British Parliament to protest against the Act and explained to Parliament the various reasons the colonists were angry with the Act including their lack of representation in Britain's parliament.