1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatyana61 [14]
3 years ago
7

If you were the leader of a developing nation, which of the following activities would you try to encourage instead of discourag

ing?
A. Brain drain
B. Increased population
C. Foreign investment
D. Increased focus on agricultural activity
History
1 answer:
12345 [234]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

follow me at charlidamelio

You might be interested in
1. Who conquered Rome? and 2. What is one example of how bad life was in Rome when it was surrounded by the Visigoths?
Aliun [14]
<span>1.For the fall of Rome, it was the Huns invading from the east that caused the domino effect, they invaded (pushed into) the Goths, who then invaded (pushed into) the Roman Empire.

2. I'm not so sure</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Bob!could not give his dog enough attention
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

Explanation:that’s sad

5 0
3 years ago
What Chinese Influences Did The Japanese Reject?
Oliga [24]
Civil Service System
7 0
3 years ago
What about “sectionalism” worried some Americans
Nostrana [21]

Answer:

Sectionalism worried some of the major Americans too much as and when they were slowly moving close towards the civil war.

Explanation:

Sectionalism refers to obtain a distinction between the two sect of the territory. Referring to the Americans, sectionalism came into being, with the dividend of North America and South America.

The feel which bring about sectionalism among the citizen of the nation is that when they develop loyalty about a part of the nation but not towards the entire nation.

Sectionalism developed among the North Americans or simply Northerners based on slavery, as they were opposing slavery, whereas Southerners were instituting slavery.

3 0
3 years ago
Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people
kirza4 [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,

However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."

We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.

Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.

The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What programs did Congress pass from Truman's Fair Deal? What programs did Congress refuse?
    9·1 answer
  • Challenges to Greek farmers
    5·1 answer
  • How was the medieval world impacted by the renaissance with respect to philosophy, artistic expression, and general beliefs abou
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the maji maji rebellion fail? east africans lost faith in their spiritual leader moments before the battle began. german
    5·1 answer
  • Which two countries fought between the Cold War?
    10·1 answer
  • 2
    12·2 answers
  • What pattern of organization does the passage "The Role of Myths in Ancient Greece" use?
    14·2 answers
  • The crusader continued off and on for approximately <br>​
    7·1 answer
  • What rights were women asking for in the 1800s
    15·1 answer
  • To what extent was the postwar era (1945 – 1963) an innocent and happy time period in american history?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!