I do not now what you mean
Maritza’s response supports school choice for personal freedoms and equal opportunity for all students to get the best education possible. The new information contradicts that position because it gives examples of charter schools that have failed and that are inferior to public schools. Maritza might consider the evidence strong enough to revise her position and rewrite the argument. She might also attempt to explain the evidence and defend her argument in a new paragraph by arguing that the benefits of school choice outweigh the disadvantages.
I would go with exploratory.
They would explore into the subject and find some really interesting dynamics or creative point of views.
If you need more help, ask me.
<3
Nonrestrictive because the sentence you "My brother who lives in Hawaii is a surfer" is not restrictive but the answer to your question is = Nonrestrictive.
Answer:
They are found by the Nazis.
Explanation:
A cat supposedly dropped a book from the book shelf that was closing off the entrance to the annex and the door opened- a Nazi was standing outside and heard it, and soon he took them away
