1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iren [92.7K]
3 years ago
6

The following question has two parts. First answer Part A. Then, answer Part B.

History
1 answer:
Reptile [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

New transportation systems such as rail, road sea and air were introduced. New languages, religions and a new way of life were introduced. The imperialists countries gained cheap, efficient workforce. Food production increased due to better farming methods. (part -a)

Imperialism impacted societies in countless negative ways. It led to slave trade which then led to social discrimination around the world. It also damaged the cultures and created disunity among the natives. Last but not least, imperialism stripped countries off their natural resources and left nothing for the natives.(part-b)

You might be interested in
How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?
vladimir1956 [14]

First it's important to think about the complications involved with the word “empire.” Rome was an empire (country ruling over other countries) before the first emperor, but the word derives from imperator, the name used by Augustus. But it meant “wielder of military power,” a kind of uber-general and was specifically not supposed to connote the idea of an emperor as we think of it today (the goal was to avoid being called a king or being seen as one). Earlier, Augustus was known as <span>dux </span>(leader) and also, later <span>princeps </span>(first citizen). As far as I know, in the days of the republic, Rome called the provinces just provinciaeor socii or amici, without a general term for their empire unless it was imperium romanum, but that really meant the military power of Rome (over others) without being a reference to the empire as a political entity. It didn’t become an empire because of the emperors, and the way we use these words now can cloud the already complicated political situation in Rome in the 1st century BC.

The point is this: the Roman Republic did have an empire as we conceive it, but the Senate was unwilling to make changes that would have enabled it to retain power over the empire. By leaving it to proconsuls to rule provinces, they allowed proconsuls, who were often generals of their armies whether they were actually proconsul at any given time or not, to accrue massive military power (imperium) that could be exerted over Rome itself. (This, by the way, is in part the inspiration behind moving American soldiers around so much—it takes away the long-term loyalty a soldier may have toward a particular general.)

So the Senate found itself in no position to defy Caesar, who named himself the constitutional title of dictator for increasing periods until he was dictator for life, or Octavian (later named Augustus), who eventually named himself imperator.

The Senate had plenty of warning about this. The civil wars between Sulla and Marius gave plenty of reason for it to make real changes, but they were so wedded to the mos maiorum (tradition of the ancestors) that they were not willing to address the very real dangers to the republic that their constitution, which was designed for a city-state, was facing (not that I have too many bright ideas about what they could have done).

To finally come around to the point, the Senate went from being the leading body of Rome to being a rubber stamp on whatever the imperator wished, but there was no single moment when Rome became an empire and the Senate lost power, and these transformations don't coincide.

For one thing, the second triumvirate was legally sanctioned (unlike the informal first triumvirate), so it was a temporary measure—it lasted two 5-year terms— and the time Octavian spent as dux was ambiguous as to where he actually stood or would stand over the long term (in 33 BC, the second term of the second triumvirate expired, and he was not made imperator until 27). When he named himself imperator, he solidified that relationship and took on the posts of consul and tribune (and various combinations of posts as time went on).

If we simplify, we would say that the Senate was the leading body of Rome before the first emperor and a prestigious but powerless body afterwards, though senators were influential in their own milieus.

One other thing to keep in mind is that Octavian’s rise to Caesar Imperator Augustus Was by no means peaceful and amicable. He gets a reputation in many people’s minds as dictatorial but stable and peaceful, but the proscriptions of the second triumvirate were every bit as bloody and greedy as those of Sulla. Ironically, it was Julius Caesar who was forgiving to his former enemies after he named himself dictator. Augustus did end widespread killings and confiscations after becoming imperator, but that was only after striking fear into everyone and wiping out all his enemies, including the likes of Cicero<span>.</span>

6 0
3 years ago
During World War I, European nations eventually involved Latin American countries in the conflict. Which two countries were forc
gladu [14]

Answer:

Below

Explanation:

Brazil had to defend itself from German submarines and other German attacks. Guatemala also had declared war on Germany and fought them.

8 0
2 years ago
Who secretly helped the the Cordova rebellion
Yuri [45]

Answer:

Mexico

Explanation:

The Cordova rebellion occurred in 1838 by some groups including the Cherokee led by Vincent Cordova a Tejano from Nacogdoches, who were rebelling against the government of Texas.

It was later revealed that the Mexican government was secretly helping Vincent Cordova to raise an army for the rebellion. The purpose is to get recognition for tribal lands in Mexico.

5 0
3 years ago
In what ways was Andrew Jackson seen as a common man
emmainna [20.7K]
Andrew Jackson's term as president (1829-1837) began a new era in American politics. For the first time in the United States history a man born in humble circumstances was now President. Politicians in the previous generations gained precedence due to their family background, wealth, prestige, and education. Families such the Adams, and the Jeffersons constituted the guidelines for political appointees. Andrew Jackson’s election showed that a mans’ lineage did not ensure a place in office. Rather it was the candidate’s ability to appeal to the voter. It was Jackson’s election that started the supposed 'age of the common man'. Jackson became the defining figure of his age due to his ability to overcome early life struggles, his military record, and his successes as an adult. Despite all his accomplishments, Jackson downplayed his past successes to suit the public's belief that Jackson was one of them. In reality Jackson was anything but common. i hope it works
8 0
3 years ago
Canada is a large producer of wheat, which is grown mainly in region _____ on the map above. A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4
amid [387]

Answer:

I thnk it is C. I am not for sure

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of the march on washington for jobs and freedom program?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the name of the group who believed in violent protests in the USA during the 1960s
    8·1 answer
  • gutenberg's printing press was not the starting point for modern history. true or false plz answer asap and accurately
    14·1 answer
  • The first agricultural revolution set the preconditions for early world-empires by
    10·1 answer
  • Can u guys help me with only the question with the star plz..
    6·1 answer
  • Confucius taught about the importance of family, respect for elders, and
    10·1 answer
  • Name three facts about the sirius b star discovered the dogon
    7·1 answer
  • What did nullify do?
    15·1 answer
  • The American Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the Rights
    15·1 answer
  • The French and Indians, the Number of each not known, had, as we found after, possessed the Sides and Brow of a Hill, in a circu
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!