Answer:
Because getting rid of one universal and powerful Christian Church increased their power and wealth. They wouldn't have the Church limiting their power anymore or have to pay taxes to it. Also as the Church was a big supporter of the king it would increase their power against the king.
So, it was all political...more power, more money, more independence from king or Church. The papacy...completely usurped every royal household snd parliament it could should they decide something for their country and subjects that went against its teachings.
The church interfered in all aspects of nation states affairs,taxes,wedfings,religious …everything and they grew tired of its meddling and took to luthers ideas.
Explanation:
Article 231, often known as the War Guilt Clause, was the opening article of the reparations section of the Treaty of Versailles, which ended the First World War between the German Empire and the Allied and Associated Powers.
Congress has implied powers is the answer
I think A to raise the quality of agricultural products
Answer:
<h2>A. Rights of life, liberty and property</h2>
Explanation:
The Scientific Revolution had shown that there are natural laws in place in the physical world and in the universe at large. John Locke and other enlightment thinkers believed that there were natural laws that applied to society and government also. This included a conviction that all human beings have certain natural rights which are to be protected and preserved. Locke's ideal was one that promoted individual freedom and equal rights and opportunity for all. Each individual's well-being (life, health, liberty, possessions) should be served by the way government and society are arranged.
In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government</em> (1690), Locke expressed his views about natural laws / natural rights in this way:
- <em>The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions… (and) when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he, as much as he can, to preserve the rest of mankind, and may not, unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away, or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.</em>
