Answer:
Read the explanation below
Explanation:
Sacrifices play a significant role in the Roman religion. During the Roman Empire, the Roman would make offerings/sacrifices of an animal to their gods to guide them. Some animals they used were pigs and sheep. The Romans believed that their gods were involved in their every day lives, so making sacrifices/offerings were very common. They usually brought these valuables into temples.
Answer:
The correct answer is it made the case stronger by showing that Palestinians were willing to live peacefully alongside Israelis.
Explanation:
The answer above explains how the Palestinians were willing to change from their violence state and ready to consider negotiation, and this affected their case to attain independence as a country.
This made the case stronger by showing the Palestinians were ready to live alongside Israelis peacefully
On November 15, 1988, The national council of Palestine came together to
in Argelia to publicly announce the country as an independent state of Palestine in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
This pronouncement also made the state of Israel to be recognized, for which it was not mentioned at that time.
The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System<span> were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.</span>After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.
Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)
D.it made people switch from hunting to herding. People didn't have to move around from place to place anymore. They could finally settle down and have a life.
Answer:
Many reasons
Explanation:
Jewish People were targeted and hated long before Hitler was even born. Antisemitism was nothing new when he showed up and began his political campaign. Churches (specifically Christian churches) portrayed Jews as unwilling to accept word of God, as agents of the devil, and as murderers of Jesus. Jewish people were accused of murdering children for religious rituals, causing plague, and conspiring to dominate the world. Obviously, none of this is true but back then, especially before media was prominent, people listened to politicians and the church.
In the 19th century, Jewish people were classed as a race and even now that ancient hate caused by lies remained. It was believed that even if a Jewish person was converted to Christianity, they still were evil as they had "Jew Blood"
Wounded German pride was to thank for Hitler's quick following. Germany's loss was pitted on German Jews, despite being a small population of the country, Hitler claiming that Jewish people had stabbed them in the back. This, obviously, was not true but it got the ball rolling. Mass debt and poverty had the country on its knees after the war. People were suffering and needed someone to look up to... Hitler was that someone, providing a new hope for German people. He brought back their pride and strengthened the country once more. People trusted him and Jewish people suffered as a result.
Historians are unable to pinpoint his antisemitism to one specific event. It is actually unknown specifically why he had such a grudge against Jewish people.
