Answer:
Yes they can If the government has a compelling interest it is seeking to protect, and the fundamental right the government seeks to restrict is fairly and narrowly regulated by the law in question, the restrictive law may be upheld by the courts.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. the parties themselves
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. the parties themselves.
A panel will be formed among the house of representative or house of senate between the two ruling parties, which are the Republican and the Democrats. The panel will then choose someone for the committees’ assignments. The Republicans make a seniority formula to choose a nominated person, while the Democrats nominate people on a seat by seat basis.
In Greek democracy, only male citizens above 18 had true power to vote and have say in government. Today, everybody in the country has that right. There are also some differences in the bodies of governing power, but I don't know too much about them, so I won't say anything because I wouldn't want to give you wrong information. :)
The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
<h3>What is the case of Schenck v. United States?</h3>
The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.
Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Schenck v. United States
<em>brainly.com/question/2764676</em>
#SPJ1
