Arguments used in defending against a criminal would be 1) Infancy 2) Duress 3) XYY chromosome (makes men men aggressive), 4) Necessity, and 5) Entrapment (forced to commit a crime).
Answer:
The manipulated variable is plant A listening to classical music.
The responding variable is plant B just there growing lol, its the control group.
Explanation:
In a way, this is a double edged sword. On one hand, the animals are needed to best test the effects, but on the other hand it can be seen as very unethical. Honestly, I don't really see a way around using the animals. Unless you get human volunteers, but there is no way to fully make them understand what they are getting themselves into which can turn unethical very, very fast. If all of a sudden one of your human volunteers decides that they do not want to be a part of the test anymore, there is noting you can do to reverse what has already been done.
Answer:
A) does overeating cause obesity?
Explanation:
Terms in all of these questions often have fuzzy definitions, so it is often a matter of judgment whether a particular condition is or is not included in the discussion.
The question most likely to be considered a question of fact is ...
A) does overeating cause obesity?
__
"Overeating" and "obesity" can be objectively defined, even if the causal relationship is less easy to establish.
"Beautiful" is usually a matter of opinion, and cannot be considered a matter of fact.
"Equal opportunities" is exceptionally difficult to define considering the range of personalities and abilities that may be offered a given opportunity. This is another term that is more a matter of opinion than of fact. Whether something "should" or "should not" be provided is, likewise, a matter of opinion (or personal philosophy or religion).
"Bad habit" is another descriptor that is difficult to say is a matter of fact. Whether something is "good" or "bad" depends on the goal, and the effect of procrastination depends on the circumstances.
