If a writer is structuring an argument towards an audience that has an interest in a specific cause, the writer will use specific vocabulary, details, stories, and facts that appeal to that cause. Pathos (the use of emotional appeal in an argument) is a strong benefit to add to an argument, and the writer might take a specific story of someone who has been affected by the cause in order to make the audience emotional. If they become emotionally invested in the argument it is more likely to be effective. Additionally, specific vocabulary (including abbreviations) and relevant facts (logos) will help the audience understand and appreciate the argument. Finally, the author should establish their credibility (ethos) as an expert on the subject so that the audience trusts what they are saying.
All would seem appropriate, but I'd say D, since it assists you in gathering data to support your clause
Lena is suggesting that Marta travels into town without her.
<h3>Why is Lena suggesting?</h3>
Lena felts she would delay Marta and rather than keeping her waiting she advice that Marta go ahead while she get a lift when she's ready to go.
Therefore, Lena is suggesting that marta
travels into town without her.
Learn more on suggestion here,
brainly.com/question/1089316
#SPJ1
The figure of speech, if I am not mistaken is personification. JFK is stating that the country can do something(implying human characteristics), but the country CAN'T literally do something for you in the way that is implied.
It's B. Thats where she starts thinking
