Answer: See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the cost for insuring the applicant = a.
Let the cost for insuring the spouse = b
Let the cost for insuring the first child= c
Let the cost for insuring the second child = d
A 35-year-old health insurance plan and that of his or her spouse costs $301 per month. This means that:
a + b = $301.
That rate increased to $430 per month if a child were included. This means the cost of a child will be:
= $430 - $301
= $129
The rate increased to $538 per month if two children were included. This means the cost for the second child will be:
= $538 - $430
= $108
The rate dropped to $269 per month for just the applicant and one child. His will be the cost of the applicant and a single child. This can be written as:
a + $129 = $269
a = $269 - $129
a = $140
Since a + b = $301
$140 + b = $301
b = $301 - $140
b = $161
Applicant = $140
The spouse = $161
The first child = $129
The second child = $108
Answer:
You just have to divide the equation by "x"'s coefficient (2).
2x/2=x
66/2=33
x=33
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y = 
x + 7
Step-by-step explanation:
the equation of a line in point- slope form is
y - b = m(x - a)
where m is the slope and (a, b ) a point on the line
y - 8 = - 
(x + 5) ← is in point- slope form
with m = -
given a line with slope m then the slope of a line perpendicular to it is
= - 
= - 
=
the equation of a line in slope- intercept form is
y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept ) , then
y = x + c ← is the partial equation
to find c substitute (- 6, - 2 ) into the partial equation
- 2 = - 9 + c ⇒ c = - 2 + 9 = 7
y = x + 7 ← equation of line K
Hi there.
The answer is g(0) = 3.
Explanation:
Given three functions with specified domains. The first and three functions both do not have x = 0 as a part of the domain. We can clear both functions.
Our main function then is currently —
You might be wondering how are we gonna find the x-value if there is no x-term?
That is to do nothing. If there is no x-term to substitute then we answer only the constant.
Answer:
Susie rounded to the nearest thousandth.
Step-by-step explanation:
since the 100th place is 0 it would round down to 39,000 when you are rounding to the nearest thousand.
