Answer:
a. $1,420,000
b. $4,514,800
Explanation:
When it comes to fixed assets, all costs that directly helped make the asset available for use are to be capitalized.
Cost of Land
= Purchase Value + Cost Incurred to Tear Down 2 Buildings + Legal Fees + Title Insurance Cost + Assessment Cost - Salvage
= 1,300,000 + 110,000 + 5,000 + 3,500 + 9,500 - 8,000
= $1,420,000
Cost of Building
= Architect's Fees + Liability Insurance Cost + Excavation Cost + Contractor's Payment + Interest Cost
= 46,000 + 3,800 + 15,000 + 4,200,000 + 250,000
= $4,514,800
Answer:
$1,100
Explanation:
Computation for the Work-in-Process transferred to the finished goods warehouse on April 30
Work-In-Process Inventory, April 1 300
Direct materials used in production 225
Direct labor costs incurred 400
Manufacturing overhead costs 350
Less Work-In-Process Inventory, April 30 ($175)
Work-in-Process transferred to the finished goods warehouse $1,100
Therefore the Work-in-Process transferred to the finished goods warehouse on April 30 will be $1,100
<em>If the marketing managers at Peyton Bike's Inc. decide to sell each bike at a price lower than $2,000 per unit</em><em>, a shortage of bikes will be created.</em>
<h3>Why are bikes in short supply?</h3>
As a result, additional problems like plant shutdowns and disruptions as well as the unheard-of increase in bike orders during the peak of the coronavirus pandemic have added to the supply chain difficulties. The sector has never before experienced such a massive increase in demand as it has over the past two years.
learn more about<em> </em>shortage of bikes here <u>brainly.com/question/13000057</u>
#SPJ4
Answer:
$28,300
Explanation:
Missing word: "<em>Calculate free cash flow."</em>
<em />
Free cash flow = Operating cash flow - Capital expenditures - Dividends
Free cash flow = $361,200 - $206,000 - $126,900
Free cash flow = $28,300
So, the Free cash flow of Hinck Corporation is $28,300.
Answer:
here you go bruv
Explanation:
The New York Times published a chart today that succinctly explains why it is so hard to cut the federal government's spending: the programs that people want to cut don't cost very much, and the programs that cost a lot people don't want to cut.