For her dad, the ending of Joan's whiny behavior is a <u>negative reinforcement</u> and for Joan the cookie is a <u>positive reinforcement</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Psychology says that the positive reinforcement means giving something to a person on performing desired action. In simple positive reinforcement is rewarding the person for their action.
Negative reinforcement means strengthening the behavior of the person by avoiding or removing negative outcome.
In the above scenario, Joan was demanding frosted cookie at the bakery. Joan’s father thought that ending of his whiny behavior is a negative reinforcement. But Joan considered cookie as the positive reinforcement.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Answer:
“To be able under all circumstances to practice five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness and kindness.”
Explanation:
Answer:
growing even though the fertility rate is decreasing
Explanation:
we know about our past all over people had not be educated even their fertility rate ll
Answer: I wrote this just now. Hope it helps!
I don't agree with the death penalty for most cases. I only agree with the death penalty for cases in which there are multiple convictions, such as someone who murdered 20 people, or someone who caused a terrorist attack that killed 10 people. However, for cases such as someone who murdered one person, I do not agree with the death penalty, because there are cases where people are wrongfully convicted, but those are much rarer in instances of multiple convictions.
I think the threat of death penalty is not successful in discouraging people from committing murder, because we have the death penalty now and people commit murder at a very high rate. What we need is more mental health resources so people with disorders and mental health issues can get proper help BEFORE committing a horrible crime. I think the death penalty is only constitutional if the criminal is convicted with killing multiple people on purpose, such as a mass shooting, terrorist attack, bombing, or something of that measure.
I hope this helps! :) Have a good day, I have to go so this is all I can answer for now, but good luck on your assignment.
