Answer: deductive reasoning;
All runners need to stretch before running.
Explanation:
My overall impression of the book Blood on the River is that it’s a very good book. The reason I like it is because, it’s really suspenseful and it gets me really excited to keep reading. I think Elisa Carbone did a very good job of going to lots of places just to get facts so she could write an awesome book like that.
The character I can connect the most with is probably Samuel because he goes through a lot of hardships, either it being food, survival or Indian attacks. He also has to befriend someone he doesn’t trust yet.
The character that me most about life and death in the beginning and the end, was probably Captain John Smith because when he made Samuel stand on one foot, and told him that the whole colony has to be able to stand on two feet to survive.
I think the theme of the story that Elisa Carbone is trying to incorporate is bravery. I know this because on pages 78-80 it shows how Samuel knew just what to do about the situation they were in. With a lot of arrows flying around the fort, he got both the boys to go under the tent. James tried to get out but Samuel was pulling him, James started to get away but then Samuel lunged at him and grabbed him harder but James bit him and got away.
Another theme I thought was survival when he was at the Native American village how he learned how to make things using all-natural supplies. I think this because, when he was in the village he learned how to hunt and survive. The supplies he learned to make was “arrows, a bow, and a knife, then Kainta taught him how to shoot straight strait at target practice.
In the first act, it is introduced to all the main characters such as Capulets, Montague, even dramatic Hero Romeo. In
the precursor to the first act, we are talking about struggles over the
years, two aristocrats "[f]rom ancient grudge break to new mutiny".
Therefore,
we talk about one of the central disputes: that the two familes are
fighting each other. That central conflict enhances the concept of being
hostage against destiny which leads to both Romeo and Juliet's death.
In the first scene, it introduces the characterization of a character centered on Romeo's painful rash emotional heart. In
the second and third scenes of the first act, we were introduced to the
heroine Juliet and gave hints on Juliet about another dispute that
might be involved in Paris.
In
the last scene of the act, the hero and the heroine meet under intense
conditions, show the emergence of character-to-fate confrontation, and
show the conflict of character against character as seen from Tybalt's
anger and insult feeling Capulet's ball.
As
all of these introduce and serve to raise a conflict, we
confirm that the purpose of Shakespeare obviously uses the first act as
an exhibition.
answer:
b. your opinion is based off of your bad experiences
explanation:
i believe this is the correct answer because a normal onion wouldn't be gooey. to be quite honest it sounds like the onion in this case was most likely rotten.
good luck :)
hopefully, this helps
have a nice day !!
