Competition between banks and nonbanks, such as insurance companies and pension funds, has not changed in 50 years, since the creation of the Federal.
A retirement fund also called a retirement fund in some countries, is a plan, fund, or scheme that provides income after retirement. Pension funds typically hold large amounts of investment capital and are major investors in public and private companies. These are especially important for stock markets dominated by large institutional investors. Together, the top 300 pension funds have approximately $6 trillion in assets.
In 2012, PricewaterhouseCoopers estimated that pension funds held more than $33.9 trillion in assets worldwide (expected to exceed $56 trillion by 2020), with mutual funds, insurance companies, and foreign exchange reserves It is the largest category of institutional investors, surpassing gold and sovereign wealth. funds, hedge funds, or private equity; With $2.66 trillion in assets under management, the Federal Endowment Trust Fund is the world's largest public pension fund.
Learn more about Pension Funds here : brainly.com/question/11464480
#SPJ4
I would say that Garza company would have net sales of $138565 because the sales discounts of $2175 and the returns of $3460 would have to be subtracted from the total $144,200 to get the $138,565 actual net income to Garza.
Answer:
It suggests that they are not doing anything competitively different.
Explanation:
Network externalities if well harnessed should bring about an increase in end users satisfaction and value derived.
Multi housing costs, ordinarily, and when taken as a whole, should results to an overall minimization of the total costs. Economics of scales and other resources are centrally allocated here, and the effect should be a gain to the entity.
Level of differentiation across firm's offerings - products or services, signals the procedures an organization adopt to mark the uniqueness of their products or services. It shows how distant they are among the other varying sets.
Thus, from the case given, the four firms have the same share of the market - 25%. The implication is that as far as we are concerned, their level of activities and postures in the market is same and/or similar. This ultimately cuts across the network externalities, multi housing costs and the level of differentiation of firm's offerings. They are thus not competitively different.