1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
salantis [7]
3 years ago
11

According to the Mahabharata, why did kingship become necessary? What differences and similarities do you see between this descr

iption of kingship and the portrayal of Egyptian kingship in "Hymn to the Pharaoh" from Module One? What, do you think, was the author's purpose in telling the story?
History
1 answer:
Nikolay [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer and Explanation:

Mahabharata says that royalty is necessary to create a sense of belonging to the people, in addition to creating religious and civil unity in a territory. This is because royalty determines the rules to be followed to create the organization of the society, in addition to representing a religion that must be followed and promoting faith and hope for its people. This kind of importance can also be seen in Egyptian royalty, with the difference that in Egypt, royalty did not represent a religion, but was seen as the very god of his people. An author who decides to tell this story, seeks to show readers how royalty can have different meanings in different cultures and regions.

You might be interested in
Place the following people in order from OLDEST to MOST RECENT
katovenus [111]
Joseph, Saul, nebuchadnezzar, Cyrus, Joshua, David, Solomon, Moses, Abraham,Jacob
7 0
3 years ago
Why was winston churchill reluctant to open a western front against germany?
Tems11 [23]
Winston Churchill reluctant to open a western front against Germany because h<span>e remembered the slaughter on the Western Front in World War I.

Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the New Deal help or hurt the USA? Explain.
valina [46]

Answer:

i think hurt

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What action does the following Constitutional clause describe? A person charged in any State with treason, felony, or other crim
g100num [7]
<span>um... I Think your answer might be A</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which ones are true or false
natima [27]

1, 3, 4, and 7 are true the rest are false.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the name of the new tax that was imposed on all American colonists and required them to pay a tax on every piece of pri
    8·2 answers
  • What is a free rider?
    10·1 answer
  • The P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act was passed in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11.
    12·1 answer
  • One president who was particularly successful in playing to the media was ronald reagan thomas jefferson richard nixon jimmy car
    9·1 answer
  • Under what circumstances, if any, do you believe citizens should disobey a law?
    11·2 answers
  • What factor helped to worsen the Great Depression?
    10·1 answer
  • 1. ________ Jefferson's idea was to make the government smaller, lower taxes, shrink the military, and make it possible for Amer
    14·2 answers
  • Which individual played a critical role in the founding of Texas by leading the Texas military forces and winning at the battle
    15·1 answer
  • Qu'est que Vasco de Gama ramène de son expédition en Inde ?
    12·1 answer
  • How might the preservation of slavery affect Northern and Southern states differently?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!