1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
suter [353]
3 years ago
11

What movement inspired imperialism in africa?

History
1 answer:
Nadusha1986 [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The main motive for imperialism was to obtain and control a supply of raw materials for industries. This meant that a weaker country with abundant natural resources would be colonised. Imperialists were often brutal in the way they treated the indigenous population.

Explanation:

hope this helps!! :D

You might be interested in
Which law made it harder for some Europeans to immigrate to the United States and easier for others? (people are saying differen
tatiyna
I think that maybe people are saying different answers because there might have been many such laws. I will mention one example: the  Diversity Visa Immigration: it means that people from Eastern Europe have a higher change of obtaining a visa due to a smaller population in the US than the western European Countries.
3 0
4 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
How have attitudes towards immigrants changed over time?
fredd [130]
At first, people were hesitant to let immigrants in because they were afraid they would take away jobs. Now, people welcome immigrants and give them priority even over Americans!
4 0
3 years ago
The nature of totalitarianism and the police state that existed in Russia, Germany, and Italy could be described as:
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

O violent and oppressive

Explanation:

authoritarian violent and oppressive a movement for the people geared toward social welfare.

6 0
3 years ago
1. comment on the cartoons considering these questions: - Who is the main character? - What mask is there? - What weapon do you
Westkost [7]

lollploljhgvjhvc,jfutfuyfifyghvytftyfivytrydrd .   dyudid

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Help on 38 39........
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these is a difference between state and federal laws?
    5·1 answer
  • What made the work of the artisans important?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the Filipinos rebel against American intervention?
    8·2 answers
  • Geometry, Help PLZ.!!
    15·2 answers
  • I need help...
    12·1 answer
  • Why did some<br> Americans disagree<br> with Spain over the<br> ownership of West<br> Florida?
    10·1 answer
  • 2. How many states can a candidate win and still lose the election
    8·1 answer
  • Throughout history, there have always been diseases and medical problems with unknown causes and cures. What diseases are scient
    8·1 answer
  • I will give BRANILIEST to the CORRECT answer
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!