1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksian1 [2.3K]
2 years ago
11

Ples help According to the text, what was the Judiciary Act of 1801

History
2 answers:
Andrei [34K]2 years ago
8 0
The Judiciary Act of 1801 created six distinct judicial circuits in order to increase the power of the judiciary. (It also created three judgeships for the five circuits east of the Appalachian mountains.)
Aleksandr-060686 [28]2 years ago
6 0

huh

it does not make any sense need more context

You might be interested in
During medieval times, books were either written on __________ or __________.
notsponge [240]

Answer:

leafs or on wood

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which statement best describes the message of the Monroe Doctrine?
iren [92.7K]
The letter C-the United States would not allow European nations to form new colonies in the Americas
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Germany pass the Nuremberg Laws under Adolf Hilters leadership
jeyben [28]

Answer:

Two distinct laws passed in Nazi Germany in September 1935 are known collectively as the Nuremberg Laws: the Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. These laws embodied many of the racial theories underpinning Nazi ideology. They would provide the legal framework for the systematic persecution of Jews in Germany.

Adolf Hitler announced the Nuremberg Laws on September 15, 1935. Germany’s parliament (the Reichstag), then made up entirely of Nazi representatives, passed the laws. Antisemitism was of central importance to the Nazi Party, so Hitler had called parliament into a special session at the annual Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg, Germany. The Nazis had long sought a legal definition that identified Jews not by religious affiliation but according to racial antisemitism. Jews in Germany were not easy to identify by sight. Many had given up traditional practices and appearances and had integrated into the mainstream of society. Some no longer practiced Judaism and had even begun celebrating Christian holidays, especially Christmas, with their non-Jewish neighbors. Many more had married Christians or converted to Christianity.

According to the Reich Citizenship Law and many ancillary decrees on its implementation, only people of “German or kindred blood” could be citizens of Germany. A supplementary decree published on November 14, the day the law went into force, defined who was and was not a Jew. The Nazis rejected the traditional view of Jews as members of a religious or cultural community. They claimed instead that Jews were a race defined by birth and by blood.

Despite the persistent claims of Nazi ideology, there was no scientifically valid basis to define Jews as a race. Nazi legislators looked therefore to family genealogy to define race. People with three or more grandparents born into the Jewish religious community were Jews by law. Grandparents born into a Jewish religious community were considered “racially” Jewish. Their “racial” status passed to their children and grandchildren. Under the law, Jews in Germany were not citizens but “subjects" of the state.

This legal definition of a Jew in Germany covered tens of thousands of people who did not think of themselves as Jews or who had neither religious nor cultural ties to the Jewish community. For example, it defined people who had converted to Christianity from Judaism as Jews. It also defined as Jews people born to parents or grandparents who had converted to Christianity. The law stripped them all of their German citizenship and deprived them of basic rights.

To further complicate the definitions, there were also people living in Germany who were defined under the Nuremberg Laws as neither German nor Jew, that is, people having only one or two grandparents born into the Jewish religious community. These “mixed-raced” individuals were known as Mischlinge. They enjoyed the same rights as “racial” Germans, but these rights were continuously curtailed through subsequent legislation.

5 0
3 years ago
NEED ANSWER ASAP URGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!What were the effec
joja [24]

Best answer:  Union troops had a greater reason to fight the Confederates.

Historical context/details:

President Abraham Lincoln issued The Emancipation Proclamation as an executive order on January 1, 1863. The executive order declared freedom for slaves in  ten Confederate states in rebellion against the Union.  It also allowed that freed slaves could join the Union Army to fight for the cause of reuniting the nation and ending slavery.  As summarized by the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, "The Proclamation broadened the goals of the Union war effort; it made the eradication of slavery into an explicit Union goal, in addition to the reuniting of the country."

While Lincoln personally was strongly against slavery, he had to tread carefully in his role as president and commander-in-chief.  The Emancipation Proclamation was carefully worded in order to retain the support of four border slave states, which remained in the Union though they were states that permitted slavery, were  Maryland, Missouri, Delaware, and Kentucky.   Lincoln wanted to keep those states loyal to the Union cause.

The Emancipation Proclamation was also a way of blocking foreign support for the Confederate cause.  According to the American Battlefield Trust, "Britain and France had considered supporting the Confederacy in order to expand their influence in the Western Hemisphere. However, many Europeans were against slavery."  Britain had abolished slavery in its territories in 1833.  France had put a final end to slavery in its territories in 1848.  So when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, it also served as a foreign policy action to keep European powers out of the US Civil War, according to Steve Jones, professor of history at Southwestern Adventist University.


7 0
3 years ago
Did geogre bush do 9/11
pentagon [3]

Answer:

no he did not

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • List 2 powers not granted to the constitution
    13·2 answers
  • The mid-Atlantic colony of Pennsylvania was founded by William Penn PRIMARILY because of his
    7·2 answers
  • What was the source of major political debate between 1820-1850?
    11·1 answer
  • Which best describes how the Great Migration affected Northern cities?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following could be said about the Sons of Liberty?
    11·1 answer
  • Hii can someone pls help, I’m not sure what the answer is
    13·1 answer
  • Three members of the ________ were convicted of assassinating Malcolm X.
    10·2 answers
  • Which feature of Greece's geography explains the ancient Greeks' need for 1 poin trade? the mountainous landscape O the dry summ
    8·1 answer
  • What is the difference between secession and nullification?
    14·1 answer
  • What did Henry Hudson think he’d found, when he sailed up the Hudson River?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!