"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
тнєу мα∂є тнє <u><em>вιℓℓ σf яιgнтѕ</em></u>
вυт συт σf уσυя ¢нσι¢є σf ωσя∂ѕ ιт ωιℓℓ вє ¢σиѕσ∂єяє∂
нσρє ι ¢συℓ∂ нєℓρ уσυ συт!!!!!!!
A or C I believe it's A. It was an attack on the U.S angered and hurt a lot of people.
Answer:
D inverse...quantity demanded
Explanation:
The law of demand states that quantity purchased varies inversely with price. In other words, the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded.
i got it from investopedia
