The statement that best explains why Shakespeare has Cassius use the word <em>fawn</em> rather than a synonym such as <em>flatter</em> to describe his actions is the A: Fawn is more negative, suggesting manipulation of another for personal gain. In the excerpt that this question is referring to, the shrewd Cassius is going to reveal some aspects of Brutus's personality, or of his behavior, that he cannot see, and he asks him to trust in him, unless he saw him flattering somebody and then slandering him on their back; in that case, Cassius concludes, Brutus could be suspicious of him. Shakespeare is using the word <em>fawn </em>in Cassius's speech in order to emphasize his manipulative and devious traits. The word does have a negative connotation, and it often implies disapproval of that person's actions.
Answer:
what text is there to cite from?
Answer:
This question is incomplete. Here is the complete question:
Not blowing horns on the streets of Kathmandu is a matter of life and death because
A) it could lead to accidents.
B) the roads are narrow.
C) there are no road dividers.
D) None of these.
Explanation:
The correct answer is option
A) it could lead to accidents.
In Kathmandu, the fact of not using the car horn has become so incorporated that even doing so seems to be something strange for its inhabitants, to the level of generating shame.
This has become something of life and death due to the accidents that can occur because of this, since the roads are loaded with traffic and even animals that cross them.
Given this information we can say that the correct answer is option A.
The answer on E2020 is
C. Orwell’s purpose is to persuade his readers to use simple language in political writing. He achieves this by suggesting steps writers can take to choose their words carefully.
(I just took the Quiz)
Explanation:
The right of people to express their opinions publicly without governmental interference, subject to the laws against libel, incitement to violence or rebellion, etc is known as freedom of speech.
