"The lines of reflection are parallel to the sides of the polygon" is the statement that is true about the lines of reflection for the polygon that will map the shape onto itself. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope that the answer has helped you.
The sequence: 9, 4, 3
The largest number in this sequence is 9.
This is because 9 is of greatest value, being farther from 0 than the numbers 3 and 4.
The smallest number in this sequence is 3.
This is because 3 is of least value, being closer to 0 than the numbers 4 and 9.
Knowing this, we can answer the first question- "Is the first digit the largest or the second digit the smallest?"
9 is the first digit in this sequence, and it is the largest.
4 is the second digit in this sequence, and it is not the smallest. 3 is the smallest value in the sequence, but it is not the second digit.
This means that "the first digit is the largest" is the correct answer to the first question.
Even numbers result in integers, numbers without decimals/fractions, when divided by 2.
3 is an odd number, since it does not result in an integer when divided by 2.
3 is the third number in this sequence.
9 is also an odd number for the same reason.
9 is the first number in this sequence.
Knowing this, we can answer the second question- "Is the third digit even or the first digit odd?"
3 is the third digit in the sequence, and it is odd, not even.
9 is the first digit in the sequence, and it is odd.
This means that "the first digit is odd" is the correct answer to the second question.
Answers:
1) The first digit, 9, is the largest digit in the sequence.
2) The first digit, 9, is odd.
Hope this helps!
Answer: Choice C) 36:25
To get this answer, we simply square each piece of the original ratio 6:5
6^2 = 36
5^2 = 25
Think of two squares where one has a side length of 6 and the other of 5. The ratio of the sides is 6:5. The areas of the two squares are 36 and 25 as mentioned above. So the ratio is 36:25. This idea can be applied to any surface area or area in general. It doesn't have to be two squares. The reason why we can apply this to any general shape is because we can break up the shape into small squares to get a rough approximation. The more squares we use, the better the approximation.
Answer:
hecgywgbfer
Step-by-step explanation:
gdebcbyvwgqfb ewgebt tgerfd werei5uhgf qtr v
again, we're assuming that both triangles are similar, and thus using proportions.

we do not use the -10, because whatever value "x" may be, can't be negative or even 0.