Answer:
Employment, property and family law.
Explanation:
The ERA has to be considered in its historical context. It was first proposed in 1923, at a time where women had little or no rights regarding work and payment and faced discrimination. The ERA proposed a total abolition of law discrimination based on sex, which would have been revolutionary at the time. Later, during the 1960s and 1970s when the ERA was again discussed, some of the problems were solved with other laws, like the Equal Pay Act or the Civil Rights Acts. However, while these acts are a key part of American Legislation, the ERA is a Constitutional Amendment, which would give a completely new level of protection.
There is criticism, mainly because many of the laws and guarantees gained during the past 100 years have been tailored to protect women in their specificity. And many fear that the ERA would negatively override those protections. However, as an Amendment, any discrimination based on sex could be challenged based on unconstitutionality. And as of now, women still suffer discrimination and the acts and laws enacted so far are not sufficient.
The first-generation immigrants in the United States who has stronger ties to religious orthodoxy than the people in that group's country of origin is "Asian Indian Americans".
<h3>Who are
Asian Indian Americans?</h3>
Asian Indians is a term used frequently to describe immigrants to the United States who come from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and India. In the middle of the nineteenth century, the first Asian Indian or Indian Americans, as they are also called "arrived in the United States".
The largest Asian Indian population in the US are-
- In the top five states of California, New York, Texas, New Jersey, and Hawaii, up to 56% of the Asian-American population resides.
- Three States—California (19%), New York (12%), and New Jersey—have the highest concentration of Indian-Americans (10 per cent).
To know more about the immigration in the United State, here
brainly.com/question/19814726
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
Answer:
6. Many people viewed this as sacred because they had won their freedom from King George. They were kind of like slaves to the British.
7. They argue this because Mrs. Washington made one, but that was not the chosen American flag.
Explanation:
Answer:
checks and balances
Explanation:
Checks and balances refers to a principle of government that specifies clearly the doctrine that separate arms of government are authorized by the constitution of the country or state to regulate the activities of other arms of government with which they share power.
Checks and balances is a fundamental principle of government across the world. The arms of government that share power are usually; executive, legislature and judiciary.
