Answer:
just use a website that summarizes stuff, like get a transcript of the video, pop that on the site, and there u go.
Explanation:
This is the main structure:
Each incorporates non-English words
Explanation:
The use of the words like 'tortillas' and exoticizing of the lands that are being talked about int he passage are the strategies of the author to introduce the reader to this feeling of being exotic in the place and to the place one is in.
The first passage is about a person who sees the baggage of their culture
The other is about one that refuses to see the culture they themselves have and are looking for something that is exotic to them and thus alluring.
The best evaluative thesis from the prompt is that D. Chimps are more closely related to humans than mice, while mice can be studied over many generations which must be considered when designing research.
<h3>What is a thesis statement?</h3>
It should be noted that a thesis statement simply means a sentence that sums up the central idea that's in a literary work.
In this case, the evaluative thesis from the prompt is that chimps are more closely related to humans than mice, while mice can be studied over many generations which must be considered when designing research.
Learn more about thesis on:
brainly.com/question/17915079
Answer:
Jem says Tom's punishment is inappropriate, but he can't describe why. Maybe assault shouldn't be a capital offense. Atticus says he has no problem with the assault statute, but he has "serious reservations" when the state asks for the death penalty on circumstantial evidence. Before a person is executed, eyewitnesses should testify that they observed the crime. In the absence of that, there is always "the shadow of a doubt... the possibility, no matter how improbable, that he's innocent." Jem notes that the jury convicted a man on circumstantial evidence. He believes juries should be eliminated. Atticus offers a superior solution to Regulate. Only judges should decide death sentences.
Explanation:
This is my opinion to your question...Change words to your own and avoid plagiarism. :)
Answer:
The title of the poem "The Wound in Time" is appropiate because the poem was made to remember the terrible wounds war leaves. Even though the war is over, there would always be history as a reference of the death of people.
Explanation:
The author of this poem Carol Ann Duffy was asked to write a poem to commemorate the the centenary of Armistice Day of 1918. The poem speaks about war and how its ominous efects. Of how war has not been over, because it has repetedly come again. "What happened next?
War. And after that? War. And now? War. War." This passage refers how war is still there.
There is a passage were the author claims how the sacrifice of all the death soldiers were not enough to learn that war is not a solution.
"History might as well be water, chastising this shore;
for we learn nothing from your endless sacrifice."
The whole poem talks about how war lives a wound in time, it can never be erased what happened.
