If lori finishes the race she would have ran 35.6 miles
I think $16,250 tax. If you need explanation comment
Answer:
¬(W∨S)→¬(J∨E)
D→(B∨C)
X is true
No
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypotheses "neither water nor soft drinks can quench your thirst" translates to ¬(W∨S) ("neither nor" negates the disjunction W∨S). The "if,... then" translates to the implication symbol (arrow). The conclusion "juice will not do it, unless the juice contains electrolytes" translates to ¬(J∨E). This is because if J or E were true, then J would be true (because E implies J), contrary to the conclusion that J is false ("juice will not do it"), then J∨S is false.
The hypothesis here is "the dyer breaks" hence D is the hypothesis. The conclusion is "we will hang the clothes to dry, or take the clothes to a coin-operated laundry" which is the same as (B∨C).
The proposition p→p is always true (according to truth tables). In this case, p:=X is true, then p is true and X is true.
X∨Y is false if and only if X is false and Y is false, so both statements X,Y must be false.
Answer:
The prime factorization of the number 24 is 2 × 2 × 2 × 3.
Using translation concepts, the change of f(x) = x to g(x) = x - 90 can be described as follows:
The base graph has been shifted down 90 units.
<h3>What is a translation?</h3>
A translation is represented by a change in the function graph, according to operations such as multiplication or sum/subtraction in it's definition.
In this problem, we have that g(x) = f(x) - 90, that is, the base graph was shifted down 90 units.
More can be learned about translation concepts at brainly.com/question/4521517
#SPJ1
