Answer:
Upon impact
A lot of people only know that the
ship came to a halt.Most people were indefferent.
The wife of astor went back to the bed
Lieutenant steffanson who had been
drinking a lemonade remused his
pre-occuption
Explanation:
hope it can be help
Answer:
The correct answers are:
- Her is the direct object of the action verb ask.
- Me is the object of the preposition for.
Explanation:
Let's go through all of the options:
1. this can't be correct because the word <em>her </em>is a pronoun, and not a noun
2. this is correct because a direct object gives the answer to the question <em>who(m)? </em>Here, the question would be - <em>Whom did you ask? </em>and the answer would be <em>Amelia and her. </em>
3. this is correct because there is a preposition <em>for </em>in this sentence and it demands an object to follow it; here, that object are the pronouns <em>you and me</em>
4. this can't be correct because <em>Amelia </em>and <em>me </em>aren't the same person so Amelia can't be the antecedent for me
Answer: I was really disappointed when I read ‘Slaughterhouse-Five.
Explanation:
Answer:
The similarity is that both manage to make the reader connect with the text through a different stimulus.
Explanation:
Both Text-to-self and Text-to-text are forms of text connection, which launch different stimuli on the reader making him connect and have a certain attachment to the established text. Text-to-self imposes this connection through personal memories that the text stimulates the reader, while text-to-test makes connections between the reader and a text that he has previously read.
Hello. You did not present the full text or answer options for this question, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
Logical fallacies are information that seems true, but is incorrect, because it is determined from generalizations, and irrational, defective and false reasoning. In this case, the best way to remove the possible logical fallacies of a text is, reading it and removing any kind of generalization and statements without correct and verifiable foundations, which present real evidences about its veracity.
