Answer:
The correct option is that the expected or the average cost of all the weekly rat purchases is $13.
Explanation:
Option a is true as there is no definite information about the future pricing is indicated. However from the historic data, it can be stated that the expected or average cost for all weekly rat purchases is $13.
Option b is not true as the statement given is a definition of mode of the purchase. There is no such information in the question.
Option c is not true as there is no information in the question indicating that the purchases are evenly distributed below and above the value of $13.
Option d is not true as there is no indication of this occurrence in the question in the definitive way.
Answer:
A) Country 1's PPF lies further to the right than country 2's PPF.
Explanation:
Production Possibility Curve shows the combination of two goods, that an economy can produce - by utilising given resources & technology best efficiently.
If country 1 produces twice the output of both goods compared to country 2. Then, country 1's PPF would lie further to the right than country 2's PPF. As, more quantities implies rightward shifted PPC, signifying more quantities of goods that can be produced.
Efficient or inefficient production leads to production inside or on PPC, doesn't shift PPC. Population change is also irrelevant in this case.
Answer:
The answer is A srry for the late response
Explanation:
Answer:
the correct option is c) change in the money wage and other resource prices does not shift the long run aggregate supply
Explanation:
First of all aggregate supply can be defined as the sum total of all the goods and services that are supplied in the economy during a defined period of time.
In the given question the option C is right because it is assumed that in the case of long run aggregate supply , the supply curve tends to remain static because any kind of change in the aggregate demand causes only temporary changes in the total output of the economy and the slope of the curve remains vertical. It is also assumed that the economy is being used at optimal as only factors like labor, capital, and technology can bring in aggregate supply.
Options a) and b) can't be true because if the supply curve is gonna shift , it is first going to shift in short run aggregate supply then long run aggregate supply , not the other way around.
Answer:
Equivalent units for materials in beginning work process is 6,940 units Equivalent units for conversion in ending work process is 6,800 units
Explanation:
Beginning work process:
Equivalent units for materials = 6,100 + (1,400 × 60%) = 6,940 units Cost per equivalent unit for materials = ($7,800 + $102,700) ÷ 6,940 = 15.92
Ending work process:
Equivalent units for conversion = 6,100 + (1400 × 50%) = 6,800 units
Cost per equivalent unit for materials = ($9,100 + $184,000) ÷ 6800 = 28.40
Cost of ending work in process = (1,400 × 60%) × 15.92219 +(1400 × 50%) × 28.39706
= 33,253 (Rounded off)