1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariana [72]
3 years ago
6

How can I historian acknowledge personal bias yet stay true to the historical method

History
1 answer:
S_A_V [24]3 years ago
3 0
They can present what they believe but they should find as many sources as possible and present various types of evidence, even the conflicting ones, because they support one of the sides and this is where their bias can be shown.
You might be interested in
How was government administration in the Byzantine Empire changed by the empire's vulnerability to outside attack
kumpel [21]

<u><em>Over time, its economic and military might waned and along with it, the empire's capacity to seize an opportunity. Add in civil unrest, natural disasters and powerful enemies such as the Arabs, Seljuk Turks, Bulgars, Normans, Slavs, and Ottoman Turks, and you can see why the Byzantine Empire eventually crumbled.</em></u>

6 0
2 years ago
Which tactic was sometimes used by management in the late 19th century to resist the
Andrei [34K]

Answer:

Lockout

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement reflects the feelings of the New York
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

It was a waste of money.

Explanation:

The feelings of the New York

Herald Tribune toward the Alaska Purchase in 1867 was that it was a total waste of money for the Country to make such purchase due to the extreme weather conditions in this area. The area was also known to be a very remote setting with few people and inhabitants willing to settle down there at that point in time. Other conditions include other pressing issues such as unemployment and the economy.

These are the reason why it was said to be a waste of money.

3 0
3 years ago
What were the advantages and disadvantages of prosperity in the 1950s?
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

most African Americans Hispanics and Native Americans were denied a part in the prosperity of the 1950s. white flight( movement to the suburbs) increased the number of minorities who lived and dirty crowded slums. Urban renewal involved tearing down Rundown neighborhoods and constructing low income housing.

4 0
2 years ago
Keyword about plantarion
grigory [225]
I’m confused what keywords
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Because of the worldwide economic depression following World War I, Germany ?
    11·1 answer
  • What kind of map projection is this?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following would NOT be considered a true statement regarding Benjamin Franklin's diplomatic trip to France?
    13·2 answers
  • Put these events in the order in which they occurred
    7·1 answer
  • Upon the repeal of the stamp act in 1766, the british government introduced the "declaratory act", which ________. 1) enabled am
    14·1 answer
  • Election in which voters cast ballots to select nominees for upcoming elections
    11·2 answers
  • What do you think the results of their actions were?
    8·1 answer
  • Need help Please Brainly to the first person right with reason and 5 Stars
    6·1 answer
  • How did the events in France, Britain, and elsewhere in Europe affect the history of North American in this period
    7·1 answer
  • Background information: This is an excerpt of a speech given by President Kennedy to a group of newspaper editors on April 20, 1
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!