Options A and D are true. The other two options are absurd and not even based on fact while A & D are true concerning this part of Africa at that time.
First, there were two independent clinical psychologists who were present or on call 24 hours a day. They had the power to intervene and to remove anyone from the study if they thought they were in distress.
Second, we had paramedics and security guards on hand and ready to intervene at a moment’s notice if anything untoward happened in the study.
Third, the study was constantly monitored by members of a five-person independent ethics panel. This was chaired by a Member of Parliament and also included members of the Holocaust Educational Trust, the Howard League for Penal Reform, the BBC’s Independent Editorial Policy Unit and a senior academic psychologist. This committee had the power to change the way the study as a whole was run and to terminate it if they had ethical concerns.
http://www.bbcprisonstudy.org/bbc-prison-study.php?p=27
I believe it is called <span>intrusive igneous.
Hope this helps,
♥<em>A.W.E.<u>S.W.A.N.</u></em>♥</span>
Answer:
I saw this question on my recent test
B. Both were common governments for early river valley civilizations.
This was my answer and Got it right. Hope This helps you! :0) lol
Well first off the founders, any amending documentation, and input by the civilian population. From there they can grow, fall, adapt, or die. In seemingly infinite ways the gov. or population can be changed.
