1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eduard
3 years ago
14

How might the battle over slave vs. free territory create sectional conflict in the United States?

History
2 answers:
ValentinkaMS [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

anastassius [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

By the mid-19th century, the United States began to attract a steady stream of foreign visitors. As one historian has noted: "What had been a somewhat obscure, occasionally romanticized backwater of colonial exploitation became, virtually overnight, a phenomenon to be investigated, a political and moral experiment to be judged."

No visitor to the United States left a more enduring record of his travels and observations than the French writer and political theorist Alexis de Tocqueville, whose Democracy in America, first published in 1835, remains one of the most trenchant and insightful analyses of American social and political practices. Tocqueville was far too shrewd an observer to be uncritical about the United States, but his verdict was fundamentally positive. "The government of democracy brings the notion of political rights to the level of the humblest citizens," he wrote, "just as the dissemination of wealth brings the notion of property within the reach of all the members of the community." Nonetheless, Tocqueville was only one of the first of a long line of thinkers to worry whether such rough equality could survive in the face of a growing factory system that threatened to create divisions between industrial workers and a new business elite.

Other travelers marveled at the growth and vitality of the country, where they could see "everywhere the most unequivocal proofs of prosperity and rapid progress in agriculture, commerce and great public works." But such optimistic views of the American experiment were by no means universal. One skeptic was English novelist Charles Dickens, who first visited the United States in 1841-42. "This is not the Republic I came to see," he wrote in a letter. "This is not the Republic of my imagination.... The more I think of its youth and strength, the poorer and more trifling in a thousand respects, it appears in my eyes. In everything of which it has made a boast -- excepting its education of the people, and its care for poor children -- it sinks immeasurably below the level I had placed it upon."

Dickens was not alone. America in the 19th century, as throughout its history, generated expectations and passions that often did not agree with a reality that was both more mundane and more complex. Already, its size and diversity defied easy generalization and invited contradiction: America was both a freedom-loving and slave-holding society, a nation of expansive and primitive frontiers as well as cities of growing commerce and industrialization.

Hope this helped

You might be interested in
Please help ASAP
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

more people would try to invent new things

Explanation:

as people got an opportunity to Express his or her talent and what one can invest and may come up to new things that the world may benefit and also the person got an encouragement to continue his or her talent and not stopping to invent and that is why today in our modern world it is due to that we are surviving

8 0
3 years ago
Freeeeegiiiiiiivvvvvveeeeeawwwwwaaaayyyyyyy
zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

Ty

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One of President George W. Bush's platform slogans was
serg [7]
One of President George W. Bush's platform slogans was "<span>d. "Fighting for the Forgotten Middle Class," although it should be noted that this was a relatively unpopular slogal. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was it successful being isolated from other civilizations
wlad13 [49]

-less attacks

-don't have to share food and water

-don't have to share other resources

-can have land

-less religious disagreements

-more time goes to farming and math and stuff like that and less to war-planning

7 0
2 years ago
Why did the British occupy Philadelphia?
bearhunter [10]
  <span>On September 11, 1777 British General William Howe's army defeated George Washington's army defending Philadelphia at the Battle of Brandywine. Washington and his army were forced to retreat, there was no longer an American army defending Philadelphia. The British marched in and occupied Philadelphia...until the fortunes of war changed and the British left Philadelphia in June, 1778 without a fight.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was NOT a result of the doctrine of manifest destiny
    13·2 answers
  • In American politics a(n) ____ refers to the instructions or demands a constituency gives to its elected officials.
    9·1 answer
  • Whose inventions include the use of assembly line methods to produce consumer goods quickly and inexpensively?
    6·2 answers
  • Please help on part A and part B. Please and thank you
    10·1 answer
  • Peter Cooper invented the first _____ when the lack of waterways in certain parts of the United States required new modes of tra
    8·1 answer
  • A political conservative probably favors a balanced budget. true or false
    6·2 answers
  • What is the correct definition of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the meaning of nation under God?
    13·2 answers
  • How were the Seminole able to resist relocation?
    11·1 answer
  • What is one major Idea from the scientific revolution that helped lead the way to the age of exploration?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!