1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
3 years ago
6

Weightman Corporation's net operating income in Year 2 was $76,385, net income before taxes was $55,385, and the net income was

$36,000. Total common stock was $200,000 at the end of both Year 2 and Year 1. The par value of common stock is $4 per share. The company's total stockholders' equity at the end of Year 2 amounted to $983,000 and at the end of Year 1 to $950,000. The market price per share at the end of Year 2 was $7.92. The company's price-earnings ratio for Year 2 is closest to:
0.58
11.00
5.18
7.14
Business
1 answer:
muminat3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

11.00

Explanation:

Earnings \: per \: share = \frac{net \: income}{shares}

36,000 net income

200,000 common stock / $4 per share= 50,000 shares

36,000 / 50,000 = 0.72 earnings per share

price-earnings \: ratio = \frac{market\: price}{EPS}

7.92 / 0.72 = 11

You might be interested in
Myles Manufacturing Company's accounting records reflect the following inventories: Dec. 31, 2014 Dec. 31, 2013 Raw materials in
Basile [38]

Answer:

Myles Manufacturing Company

Cost of Goods Sold = $2,700,000

Explanation:

Cost of Goods Sold:

Beginning Inventory of Raw Materials = $820,000

Purchase of Materials = $900,000

Less closing inventory of Raw Materials = $620,000

Cost of Raw Materials used in production = $1,100,000

Opening WIP = $220,000

Cost of Raw Materials used in production = $1,100,000

Direct Labour = $1,000,000

Manufacturing Overhead = $960,000

Less Closing WIP = $300,000

Cost of Goods Manufactured = $2,980,000

Opening Finished Goods = $100,000

Cost of Goods Manufactured = $2,980,000

Less closing Finished Goods = $380,000

Cost of Goods Sold = $2,700,000

3 0
3 years ago
In 2003, several investment banking firms were fined $1.4 billion for ethics abuse related to the underwriting process. will thi
Mkey [24]
This can be a deterrent for engaging in practices that are ethically wrong during underwriting process.
Knowing that they could be fined large amount of money if found to be engaging in acts that ethically incorrect will serves to discourage investment banking firms from such acts.<span />
3 0
3 years ago
The table below presents the average and marginal cost of producing cheeseburgers per hour at a roadside diner.
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> falling </u>and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is <u>rising</u>.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is <u>  rising </u> and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <u>at a minimum</u>.

Explanation:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> </u><em><u>falling </u></em>and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is <em><u>rising</u></em>.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average total cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> falling.</u>

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the marginal cost of production is<u> rising.</u>

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is <u> </u><em><u> rising</u></em><u> </u> and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <em><u>at a minimum</u></em>.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 70 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is<u> rising.</u>

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of cheeseburger production at quantities of 50 and 60 cheeseburgers per hour are equal and the lowest on the table, this implies that the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <u>at a minimum</u> at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour.

7 0
3 years ago
Sheaves, Inc., has sales of $50,000, costs of $23,000, depreciation expense of $2,250, and interest expense of $2,000.
Dominik [7]

Answer:

$21,767.50

Explanation:

<u>Computation table:</u>

<u>Particular                      Amount</u>

Sales                             $50,000

Less: Costs                   $23,000

<u>Less: Depreciation       $2,250</u>

<u>EBIT                              $24,750</u>

<u>Less: Interest               $2,000. </u>

<u>EBT                              $22,750</u>

<u>Less: Tax (23%)           $5,232.50 </u>

<u>Net Income              $17,517.50</u>

$24,750 + 2,250 -5,232.50

$21,767.50

6 0
3 years ago
A firm uses a standard costing system and allocates variable overhead costs based on direct labor hours. The annual budget proje
DENIUS [597]

Answer:

Your answer is given below:

Explanation:

Statement showing Computations  

         Paticulars                                                                             Amount

Variable overhead cost per unit =100,000/1,000                   100.00

Standard Variable overhead for 750 Units = 750 * 100             75,000.00

Actual Variable overhead             75,000.00

Variable overhead spending variance= Standard VO - Actual VO  

Variable overhead spending variance= 75,000 - 75,000  

Variable overhead spending variance= 0

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Buchanan Company recently was sued by a competitor for patent infringement. Attorneys have determined that it is probable that B
    10·1 answer
  • True or false?
    12·2 answers
  • A product line can include similar products?
    15·1 answer
  • With respect to product quality, deming believed that a company should never ________. pay more attention to quality than to pri
    6·1 answer
  • Williamson Industries has $7 billion in sales and $2 billion in fixed assets. Currently, the company's fixed assets are operatin
    14·1 answer
  • International marketing can be defined as
    13·1 answer
  • Donald’s debt to Everett is past due. Everett brings a legal action against Donald to collect the debt. To ensure that a judgmen
    10·1 answer
  • or each of the following situations, indicate the liability amount, if any, that is reported on the balance sheet of Bloomington
    7·1 answer
  • The natural rate of unemployment is best defined as A. the state of the economy when there is zero unemployment. B. the rate of
    8·1 answer
  • In what specific ways do you see yourself as being a part of a globalized world?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!