Answer:
The development of agriculture introduced trading and surplus. This allowed people to expand the way of living and trading. People were able to store food by digging holes within the ground.
Explanation:
i like yo cut g
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The conditions differ between North American plantations and that of Caribbean plantations in many ways. This includes:
1. Slaves in North American plantations have little or no chance of freedom. Slaves in the Caribbean plantation has a better chance of freedom
2. There are lesser death rates in North American plantations compared to the Caribbean plantations
3. Slaves in North American plantations gave birth more compared to those in Caribbean plantations.
4. Each of North American plantations has fewer slaves compared to those of Caribbean plantations
5. There is a higher tolerance of racial mixing in Caribbean plantations compared to North Americans.
A. The president makes the economic decisions in a command economy.
A command economy is an economy where government officials, headed by the president, make most of the decisions.
The government owns some or all of the industries producing goods and services. They decide on what goods to produce and its corresponding prices, as well as, how to distribute the goods.
Under this economy, mass unemployment is avoided, abuse of monopoly power is prevented, and produced goods will benefit society and enable everyone to have access to their basic necessities.
Answer:
Personally, I would make some changes to the school systems. I would increase the national payment to schools, and try to make them a better overall place. I would also make a group of around 4 or 5 people to make decisions. There would be no president, just that group. Also I would let some jobs available to kids 13 or up. They would have to be proven responsible though.
Explanation:
I hope this helps, i kinda just spat random things out there but i tried, hope this is enough :D
The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Hence, the correct statement is option C.
<h3>What happened in the case of Wainwright and Arizona?</h3>
In this case, the Supreme Court declared that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have state-appointed attorneys on their behalf.
The missing information is given below:
A. Baker v. Carr (1962) and Engel v. Vitale (1962)
B. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Roe v. Wade (1973)
C. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
D. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)
Hence, The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). the correct statement is option C.
learn more about case of Wainwright and Arizona:
brainly.com/question/10320938
#SPJ1
