Answer:
will you be my valentine?
I have loved you since I was nine
You are like my sunshine.
I love you with my whole heart.
We cannot be apart.
I know you dont like me
Can we restart?
I think it would be smart.
I will take you to walmart.
I hope you see
Everytime i see you my heart gets bouncy
Lets go get some coffee.
maybe we can talk things over.
I hope you feel the same.
Answer:
The name Hopi is a shortened form of their autonym, Hopituh Shi-nu-mu ("The Peaceful People" or "Peaceful Little Ones").
Definition of Hopi: A member of a Pueblo people living chiefly in northeastern Arizona.
:O wall of txt!
Q&A:
Which description provides the best objective summary of the article in the passage?
A. The purpose of the article is to tilt the reader’s opinion against food labeling for genetically engineered food. It presents expert opinion to support the claim that genetically engineered foods are safe and dismisses the opposing arguments.
B. The purpose of the article is to tilt the reader’s opinion in favor of food labeling for genetically engineered food. It refutes claims that genetically engineered foods are safe by using expert opinion to support the opposite claim.
C. The article presents a balanced view of the debate about labeling genetically engineered foods. It examines the claim that genetically engineered foods are as safe as organic foods and then examines claims to the contrary.
D. The article presents a balanced view of the debate about labeling genetically engineered foods. Its purpose is to demonstrate fallacies in different arguments for and against the claim that genetically engineered foods are safe.
it includes pros n cons so its a balanced view. it also examines both claims so ans is C
Answer:
B
Explanation:
This statement is fluff because it says very little or nothing at all that is useful to the passage. It is clear from reading the names of the additives that they are chemicals, but it is even more unnecessary to say that they sound scary. This opinion does not add any substance to the piece and is distracting since at most it expresses the opinion of the author and at worse results in a disjointed description.
