Answer:
Akbar was secular and Aurangzeb was not secular
Explanation:
Akbar was secular and he allowed people of all religion to practice their religious rituals without any fear in his reign. This was evident from the Akbar decision to allow his Hindu wife Jodha to continue being Hindu.
While on the other hand Aurangzeb was not secular and he forcefully converted people of other religion to adopt Islam forcefully
The mandate system had the effect of creating new borders and new countries that exist to this day in the Middle East. It also set up some future issues for Middle East conflict.
Context/detail:
When World War I erupted, the Ottoman Empire sided with Germany as part of the "Central Powers." In the end, the Central Powers lost and the Turkish empire of the Ottomans ceased to exist as an empire. Turkey remained as a country, but it lost control over other territories that it had held before.
The League of Nations created a system for governing former German and Ottoman territories, called "the mandate system." The mandate system authorized a member nation of the League of Nations to govern a former German or Turkish colonial area after the conclusion of World War I. There were mandate territories for former German territories in Africa and Asia, as well for former Ottoman territories in the Middle East.
The former Turkish provinces of Syria, Iraq and Palestine in the Middle East were divided into a French mandate territory and British mandate territory. The British mandate rule over Palestine, in particular, has much to do with the history of the development of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
<span>The answer would be D. years old</span>
Because of Marie Antoinette I think
