I think it might be C.Third stage: nature viewed as a type of divine presence In my opinion if you as me, Nature is a divine presence, being able to see and learn so many new things.
<span>While the passage does use the term "boys" which could create a sense of nostalgia, the imagery clearly creates a very serious and judgmental tone, which makes the audience responsible for the execution. There isn't any reference to anything cheerful, although the word "holiday" is used. There is also no reference to anything that would indicate the author wants the audience to think about how the boys were raised. The audience is made to feel the burden of responsibility of the hanging of the boys.
A l</span><span>ine such as "you charge them with the responsibility that we may have a hanging" clearly implicates the audience. YOU are responsible. Also the line, "</span>that we may deck Chicago in a holiday garb and let the people have their fill of blood", implicates everybody who would be celebrating in witnessing the hanging, meaning the audience, again. The audience in meant to imagine celebrating whilst drinking blood, literally the blood of the dead boys and a metaphor for their involvement. Finally, the line, "that you may put stains upon the heart of every man, woman and child on that day and that the dead walls of Chicago will tell the story of blood", implicates the audience by "staining" them with the blood of the dead. A mark of guilt would metaphorically be on every man, woman, and child's hearts forever. In this passage the audience is being led away from the death penalty with harsh phrases that implicate them in the decision they make. Clearly, a better alternative would be to punish the boys in another way, alleviating the audience from the guilt and responsibility of their deaths.
So I am assuming the first question has to do with the given post....?
Anyways, here is what I got, A short summary of the given post is the following: Khias, or whomever wrote it, found that listening to the speech without stopping it to examine it carefully and accurately, caused them to feel overwhelmed. They then listened to it again, this time stopping it and using the strategy of pausing to summarize it, and they then understood it more.
2. Evaluate the strength of those reasons and evidence: This is a good strategy, especially since they gave a claim, which was that they failed to understand a certain thing, and while they tried new things, they have come to understand it more. This is a strong strategy.
3. Was any irrelevant evidence used by Johnson? If so, what was the impact on you as the listener? I don't think so, she had a problem, and found a solution to it.
I cannot answer 4 and 5 because I think that requires you yourself, since I am not a part of your class, and I don't know your classmates. I hope this helps ~♡
