Answer:
The two armies met at Stamford Bridge, just outside York, on 25 September 1066. It was a bloody battle and one in which Harold's army (the Saxons) broke through the Viking invaders front line to go on and win the battle. ... The Vikings didn't know what hit them. Harold's men killed Harald Hardrada and Tostig.
Explanation:
the Industrial revolution was the boom of factories to produce products such as clothes. The factories main use was cotton. When the demand for cotton increased the more cotton was needed to be produced in turn making agriculture rise slightly. Everyone benefited except the slaves. Another effect was the poor working conditions in the factory that led to a working class revolution
It was a monarchy because it was under a kingdom
The differences in rates of growth are often attributed to two factors: government and entrepreneurship. The two are not mutually exclusive. In the early stages of sustained growth, government has often provided the incentives for entrepreneurship to take hold.
Economic instability is caused by changes in the conditions that kept the economy stable. Some of these include: Stock market fluctuations. Fall in home prices
Brainiliest please
The plantation system developed for several reasons. The Southern colonies had been founded by companies or proprietors who wished to make a profit, and they accordingly encouraged cash crops like tobacco (in the Chesapeake) and rice (in the Low Country). These crops were labor intensive, which meant that growers turned first to indentured servants and then to African slaves as a labor supply (so, too, did sugar planters in the Caribbean.) They also required a great deal of land and capital, which meant that due to an economic principle called "economies of scale," cash crops, especially rice, favored very wealthy people with large landholdings and access to large labor forces. So in the Southern colonies/United States, the economic realities of staple crop production favored the formation of large farms, or plantations. Cotton, which emerged as the biggest cash crop in the nineteenth-century South, was less shaped by economies of scale--many small planters and farmers could profitably raise the crop. But even still, the largest cotton planters in places like Alabama and Mississippi dominated the Southern economy and increasingly its politics. Large capital investments in land and enslaved people made the production of large amounts of cotton profitable, so the region's dependence on cash crops continued to foster the plantation system.
