Hello there!
Question #1
<span>What was established in the case of Miranda v. Arizona?
One aspect that they truly convened was the fifth amendment which were to require laws that conveyed certain things that would have to be considered and handled properly.
Question #2
</span><span>How does this affect the legal process?
This would affect is because before this, it was quite easier to acquire certain laws, and to easily dishonor them. But ever sense this came about, it was more serious.
Question #3
</span><span> In the case of U.S. v. Nixon, what did the court ultimately decide about the president with regard to rule of law?
They decided that the president does not inform or enforce the final decision. It would have to go into a process,and not a pure law straight abound.
I hope this helps you!</span>
The positives were that you actually had a home and the negative was that you had a part of the military. another positive was that you had to chance to cultivate the downside was that you had to give a set amount of your harvested crops to your duke/duchess or whoever owns said land. I hope this will give you some pros and cons to feudalism
Answer:
A. Serbia,
Why: It achieved independence in 1867.
The correct answer is:
<h2>
C. To appeal to the dissatisfied, multi-ethnic population of the Soviet Union.
</h2>
Gorbachev was not trying "to establish his dominance," as the other answer here had suggested. When Gorbachev came into leadership in the USSR, the Soviet economy was struggling and there were dissidents across the spectrum of the country who called out for reforms and changes.
In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev proposed policies of perestroika (restructuring) and glasnost (openness) in the Soviet Union. Perestroika meant allowing some measure of private enterprise in the Soviet Union. Glasnost meant allowing a bit of freedom in regard to speech and publication.
Answer:
B. had difficulty at times adjusting to civilian life
Explanation:
