George whoI heard bout this he wrote a bookTexas Declaration of independence something like that
Answer for the second
'Released from foreign war, we would probably be plunged into all the misery of anarchy and intestine war. Can we suppose that the people of the south, would submit to having the seat of Empire at Philadelphia, or New England; or that the people oppressed by a change of government, contrasting their misery with their former happy state, would not invite Britain to reassume the sovereignty.” — James Chalmers, Plain Truth, 1776
If the one above is the argument, you might consider that the colonists did obtain independence from England. That by itself was something that Chalmers always thought to be impossible without serious repercussions. He used to say that in the case of achieving freedom, America would just end up being attacked and maybe even colonized by some other country. What happened, thought, was that after the revolution, other countries gained respect for America as an opponent and the country was eventually left to be.
The historical patterns of the Russian civilization and identity have been influenced by many foreign forces that have variously occupied the Russian landscape.
<h3>What are historical patterns?</h3>
Historical patterns follow the historical development of a people or an entity. For example, the historical patterns of the Russian civilization and identity has been shaped by various foreign forces that occupied the entity since early-recorded histories.
It first started with the early Mongol invasions to the Tsarists regimes. The Slavic, Tatar, Finnic, Vikings, and Steppe people have exercised authority over Russia. Russian then moved to the enlightenment and industrialization ages before resorting to endless revolutions and wars, including experiments with communism and socialism.
Thus, Russia is well-recognized for its political rises to world power levels, including varying upheavals marking its historical patterns.
Learn more about the historical patterns of Russian civilization and identity at brainly.com/question/25988762
Early modern philosophy in Europe and Great Britain is awash with discussions of the emotions: they figure not only in philosophical psychology and related fields, but also in theories of epistemic method, metaphysics, ethics, political theory and practical reasoning in general. Moreover, interest in the emotions links philosophy with work in other, sometimes unexpected areas, such as medicine, art, literature, and practical guides on everything from child-rearing to the treatment of subordinates. Because of the breadth of the topic, this article can offer only an overview, but perhaps it will be enough to give some idea how philosophically rich and challenging the conception of the emotions was in this period. Most attention will be devoted to the familiar figures of early modern philosophy and how they conceived of the emotions as valuable, even indispensable aspects of embodied human life, which were largely constitutive of the self and identity that matter to us practically.
A word of caution is in order: there is a plethora of source material, and this entry is offered as a survey for organizing that material. Alas, much worthy material must be excluded here. This article and its supplements are designed for readers browsing for specific information, as well as those hardy souls who may wish to read it straight through. The main document offers a thematic overview of early modern discussions of the emotions. Separate links lead to documents devoted to the pre-history of the topic, as well as to some of the most important individual figures in early modern philosophy. Hope this helps! Mark brainly please this took me a lot of time!
What Fredrick Olmstead said he needed to be added to large cities to provide the resident's opportunity to touch and view nature are city parks. This is further explained below.
<h3>What
are city parks.?</h3>
Generally, city parks. is simply defined as Naturalistic spaces in urban settings are what city parks are all about.
In conclusion, In order to provide residents a chance to interact with nature, Fredrick Olmstead advocated the creation of municipal parks.
Read more about city parks.
brainly.com/question/25376516
#SPJ1
