1. a battle could happen in cause of who wants power and take control
2.a battle could occur from disagring of two groups of people
3. their can be battle of debate and law of who is right or wrong
The name of the case was Plessy vs. Ferguson. Hope this helps :)
The correct answer is B. She represented the women who stayed behind and kept the factories and businesses running while there husbands went of to war.
Answer:
Criticizing the government was considered unpatriotic in the United States during World War I
Explanation:
During the World War I, government were taking many steps to engaged people and distracting them the war activities. The federal government put forth several different laws/campaigns to increase patriotism. This include food rationing campaigns, encouraging women to join the work force which were taking by the people as negative activity of the government.
This war lasted for about 52 months and it was a life-changing experience for the generation of that time.
The articles gave the government no separation of powers. The government was too weak, the Articles left much of the power to the states (if I remember correctly, states basically went by their own state constitution). Congress didn't have the power to tax. To change the Articles, it had to be decided unanimously by all states. Also, 9 out of the 13 states had to approve any major law before it was passed and Congress couldn't regulate commerce. There was no president to lead, no established court system, and every state had only one vote in congress.
Basically, the articles created no separate executive department to carry out and enforce the acts of Congress and no national court system to interpret the meaning of laws.
